Can someone explain number 1 to me?

4/5 and got the easiest one wrong. Go me.

I picked E on question 5 instead of A. I did this because I thought we would have to assume lightning strikes were occurring when meteorites impacting Earth. Can someone help me understand why A is better than A without making an assumption

Was torn between A and E and went with E.

Bamboozled by E squad

I feel like his explanations get weaker as the questions get more difficult. Perfect example - why "B" is wrong in this question.

I got it right but was stumped by the "not" language

would be great if they had a lesson dedicated to flushing out modifiers and referents fast (I know they already have one that hits this topic, but not for the speed component)

Can someone help me understand why #4 is A and not E? Still not getting it after reading through the explanations...

#3 -_-

For question 2, how were we able to infer that creatures was a referent for dragons?

I don't understand how B can be wrong. It follows the logic chain and the question asks about what follows most logically based on the statements in the passage, NOT just generally.

Question 2 does not make sense. How are you supposed to infer glacial from interglacial without any background?

I'm confused as to why the kernel for Q1 is not Antibiotics kill bacteria. FAil can modify kill.

Why is "we are not always certain how distinct from our current state something needs to be to constitute “true happiness.” " not a conclusion? Anyone have insight?