If i got 3/5 on this, should I keep doing drills or better to move on and come back to these question types later?

#help

Can someone pls explain this to me : "Some parrots that can learn to speak a few words and phrases show tremendous affection for an owner who raised the bird from a chick."

HOW is this a valid inference that can be drawn? it doesn't follow the "most before all" rule

#help #help #help

Can someone explain how we are supposed to know this is a bi-conditional EVEN after mapping out:

ER --> eligible

/ER --> /eligible

I don't think I'd be able to recognize that this is a bi-conditional

"Now consider two conclusions: access is justified versus access if not justified. Which conclusion is reachable via the first rule? Access is not justified. That is a reachable conclusion. To reach it, we just need to trigger the rule contrapositively."

Can someone explain why the justified conclusion is not reachable if it's the suff condition? 

Guys why is "To be a Jedi, one must be a Force user." a conditional statement, when there isn't a conditional indicator. I get it is conditional, but their teaching us to rely on the indicator to know which group it is.

Rule: No restrictions should be placed on the sale of merchandise. Why aren't we following group 4 (neg, and make nec) here: Rule: sale-merch → /restrict

Wearing headphones sound is spotty and cuts out in weird places idk why

bruh I am actually the 1% that choose D. brutal lmao