Got this one wrong because I had A chosen and didn't read the last part of E thats unforunate

This question type is so frusturating because many of these questions my intuition is right, but I cannot for the life of me explain why they're right, they just feel right in my head. My head is doing some kind of processing but I cannot explain or write out the reasonings. Then there are the ones my inuition don't pick up and I feel lost.

Had D then switched to A last second. Completely didn't even realize that I chose A based off the author's opinion and not the many lawyers. This was hard to realize as the two perspectives are generally in agreement, with only a slight difference.

Note to self: Remember even perspectives that are in agreement can differ in the "why they believe" aspect.

to me this question type feels so intuitive but I can't make the reasoning as to why I think an AC is correct conscious enough to describe consistently. Any tips?

I really overthought the fuck outta this question

in BR this answer was so obvious at first glance. No idea what I was thinking while taking the test lol

the way this question is broken down is so damn much to process 

This is one of those questions where you a lot of choose the right AC only due to the other ACs seeming wrong and not because we think it's right.

past 3 5 difficult answers ive gotten right somehow despite not fulling understand just going off gut feeling. Is this good or bad

Accidentally thought Muriel was John in the passages. That explains why every answer choice felt wrong to me.

I like think of this question of every stage as a parlay.

You can have a 9 leg parlay with -250 odds on each leg. Individually, they are all likely to hit (based on the odds at least), and yet when combined altogether the odds are +1966 and NOT -250.

Similar to each stage as described by JY. Each stage is (like his example) 90/10 odds. This does not mean that the mission to mars has a 90/10 of no failure, as probabilities do not work that way.

Hope this helps someone else understand.

I have literally never done a hard question under time but this was seemingly easy as 123. Idk whats going on but im okay with it

Is another way to get to the answer E is that the argument requires there are medevial epistemologists, but E weakens that assumption?

I was on the brink of solving this in BR but decided to just go with my original answer. Knew E could be right but didn't know how my original choice was wrong.

Struggling with the idea that "uncomfortable" can equate to / C. Does the "un" negate it in lawgic terms? I thought there could be a neutral.

No way I would've reasoned why E is a NA, but I understand how to get the correct answer in the allotted time.

Can't really explain my thought process, but I understood enough of the structure to realize and understand that B just felt right. Idk if its good to lean on my intuition but for this PSAr types it has been real good to me.