because of how stupidly hard the previous questions are, ive been really second guessing my answers for all of these. I thought i had this passage down really well but the questions are insanely weird
@lilypawliczak The information mentioned is damaging information introduced when stealing thunder, and its phrased as "at least some" because the author never definitively says that damaging information is always influential of later evaluations, just that it may create an early negative impression.
I hate the fact that I can't physically highlight on the passage and when I am trying to answer I go cross eyed attempting to recall where a particular example is. Not helpful
Maybe not the best way to think about it, but when doing questions like this I tend to find the most wishy-washy answer and go for it, and that has nearly always worked.
25 comments
I've started to say "thank you" when I get the correct answer. Don't know who I'm thanking but I hope they're listening
@marianareads this energy is everything.... similar to saying bless me after you sneeze
its like u know it but you also feel like ur not sure of anything anymore
YES LOL. I just stared at the answer, clicked on it, and still thought about fully submitting it as my final choice UGHHHH.
how is this one lower difficulty than the last one???
Anyone hate when the answer is A? If its A, I always second guess myself
I think this is only my second question getting right from this passage lol
because of how stupidly hard the previous questions are, ive been really second guessing my answers for all of these. I thought i had this passage down really well but the questions are insanely weird
Lol gave us an easy question to make us feel better after that last one huh?
The LSAT did lol, they don't choose which questions come with the passage. Although I suppose they could have changed the order of the questions.
I had A but then didn't like the "at least some information" ??? what information specifically? and why at least some
@lilypawliczak The information mentioned is damaging information introduced when stealing thunder, and its phrased as "at least some" because the author never definitively says that damaging information is always influential of later evaluations, just that it may create an early negative impression.
I got this one right about 20 seconds over time, but man did I overthink this one lol
Nah for reals ! I legit have to force myself to move to the next question or in this case click the check mark so that I don't overthink it lol!
I hate my life
Purpose in context in Lawgic:
If correct then it accurately describes something the author did.
Correct answer → Describes something the author did
Describes something the author did→Correct answerpsych major clutch
I hate the fact that I can't physically highlight on the passage and when I am trying to answer I go cross eyed attempting to recall where a particular example is. Not helpful
Will that highlight be there on the actual LSAT or is that just for our practice?
Maybe not the best way to think about it, but when doing questions like this I tend to find the most wishy-washy answer and go for it, and that has nearly always worked.
Of course it was A meanwhile I’m
Traumatized from choosing A since it’s been wrong the last two questions lol
finally
This one was harder to me than the previous one (got them both right but still)
i do so well on these but then the drills I panic and do AWFUL.
i got this one wrong but got the previous question correct... bruh