I def suck at these

me too uhhhh

Garbonzo beans of a section smh

4/5 not bad

ahhh I got it wrong but in BR I understood why E was the best answer lol def need to slow down a tad

up what yo

def not motivated

your welcome

yeah pretty much the word "right" was used in a different way very close in its meaning but not exactly.... At first glance it completely went over my head but reading it again I can see the difference. Almost like an emotional and logical usage of the word right. Like she has a right to sell because legally she can but no right to sell because what about the people cries....

where did you get your shoes?

hi

false dichotomy was the thing that came to mind when I first read this

Colin donates his extra cents to charities at Panda Express #goodman #100%support

false dichotomy?

straight forward my a$$!

go to the practice tab and then click on drills after that look at your previous drills and it will be there.

I legit struggle with the same thing where I read and forget it because my heart rate is to high from anxiety!! Is propranolol a supplement or a prescribed pill?

Okay this is damn near impossible to do under a minute lol but anyways I was reading "The power score LSAT logical reasoning bible" and it said something that helped me get this answer right.

-new elements must be in the conclusions (so like new information)

-Elements that are common to both the premise and the conclusion normally do not appear in the correct AC.

So what I did was this:

p1: not clear ambiguous moral belief(-) -->less likely working out moral beliefs (x)

p2: knowledge increases(X)-->inclination decreases(-)

------------

c: the more history a person knows(X)-->less likely the person's to view as the working out of moral themes(X)

Ok so now that I have this translation I just eliminated everything that was repeated and for the purpose of showing how I did it I put (x) on all the things that were repeated and what was left I put (-)

So I was left with this:

not clear ambiguous moral belief--inclination decreases

So I looked for answer that had both of these and it was correct!

lmaoooo same I was left with AC A and E and failed !

Ok so I got this correct but ended up getting it wrong on BR!!!

Here is what I did:

1.So I read it like this

acquire $-->sacrifice health-->/healthy-->/happy

2.Then I did this

acquire $-->/happy

and then I got confused because I didn't kick up the sufficient condition!!!!

so then it should've been done like this:

acquire $ sacrifices health-->/happy

---------

/acquire $

actually it can you just need to see what indicator is being used and read it correctly sufficient->necessary. So it can't go the other way.

nope because the conclusion would be the necessary condition in this question.

WHO MAKES THESE QUESTIONS JESUS CHRIST !!!!

this is exactly what I assumed Fawk

I think you just have to weaken the support to the hypothesis so in this question we can see that the author said that this stone thingy is actually a communal object instead of a weapon ok cool! But answer choice B helps us change the hypothesis given because it tells us that...,welllll nah bruh your wrong because communal objects get passed down from generation to generation!!!! If it came from a tomb then it must've had been something else