because of how stupidly hard the previous questions are, ive been really second guessing my answers for all of these. I thought i had this passage down really well but the questions are insanely weird

So shrimp are xenophobic and will only breed with their cousin #habsshrimp

Saying Pliny and Aeschylus are from the same time is like saying Barak Obama and Shakespeare are from the same time.

I feel like it could be assumed here that Walt hasnt done anything illegal to obtain a pass, (barring the potentiall illegality of animal cruelty), like stealing a pass. The argument also does not stipulate that the passes must be linked to a membership or named card, in which case Walt could potentially have stolen a card that is not tied to personal identity.

From the module where they asked to rank the strength of the arguments, the assumption that aggressiveness and potential to cause injuries were reasons not to keep a pet struck me as inherently weak. They use the example of guard dogs, but in many cases people actually even use TIGERS for those very reasons to keep as pets. It really makes the entire argument fall apart.

wtf does "the largest privately owned" even qualify here. Is Vidmar's collection the largest privately owned collection in the world? Or is it that of Vidmars collections, the one being auctioned is the largest of hers that is privately owned, (if thats even possible)? The question stim and answers are absurdly worded.

brain died and resurrected halfway through. New brain was not smart enough to recognize B as wrong x-x

J.Y. makes the part to whole error in his logical reasoning here with shallow dive. If you have a 75-80% confidence rate of correctly eliminating each answer choice, then that does not all add up to having a pretty good chance at getting the answer right.

All i understood about this question was that it was reasoning by analogy and ruled out every other question from that. I still have no idea really what the argument is trying to say.

Nothing ever obtains...

I saw D was the first one discussed in the video and was sad since I was sure it was A and then was pleasantly surprised to have my reasoning validated :D

ive been consistently getting these right but only with mapping out the question after a really long time. Every question ive done on this module has been a minute or 2 over the target when it does not feel like I could have understood it faster.

At the same time on PT's its like sufficient assumption questions are frequently ones that I have trouble with even without this framework, so it just feels like this kind of question in general is harder than the rest. I pretty much always end up going over time because of them.