i've been so good at RRE but then got 3/5 then 4/5 blind review??? i'm so sad but also maybe it's cus it's midnight rn

fun (somehow helpful) fact!

i'm in an advanced shakespeare course at school, and a guy in my class acts in a some shakespeare play thing that simulates the conditions of how plays were conducted in shakespearean times.

he told us that back in the day, every actor had their own lines, and basically nothing of anything else: no knowledge of other people's casted roles or lines, no dress rehearsals, etc.

this random knowledge allowed me to choose the correct answer choice, so i felt compelled to share. yay!

i don't believe this was a level 5 difficulty tbh. got it -0:08s and answered correctly with full confidence like ermmm smth not right

to the ppl saying they chose D just because it was more specific, PLS KNOW that it's not because of the specificity.

it's because C says "as much." meaning, they're eating just as much fat as normal red-meat eaters, which contradicts the stimulus.

Answer choice D says they consume MORE fat, which is why it actually resolves the stimulus' discrepancy. yas!

read it too fast and fell for A...immediately regretted and knew it was B once i peeked and saw 0%

@jamandaa fs. POE seems much more efficient than hunting for these questions

@gpigalicious fr...if i got the question right and already know WHY i got it right, isn't it waste of time to watch the vid? or will it somehow subconsciously help like what

I knew the answer was E, but still i was so confused about how to approach this question when going to the answers. but i think i figured it out and maybe it'll help u too.

I basically just went through the answers giving them "true" or "false" labels.

bc this is a MBF question, 4 should be true and 1 must be false.

So, based on the info we learned in the stimulus, labelling true or false on each answer with POE can make it sooo much simpler (at least for me). yay

these questions take so long tho like how am i sposed to get it in 2 mins when i need to read every single option too

i swear these videos just make it more complicated E just seemed right smh

ive gotten all the 5 difficulty right so far this is a miracle

loved the F bombs in this vid lmaooo

didn't fall for the trap and got it in 26 seconds lfg

got it right and with one second left muahahha

got it right with ONE SECOND over are u fr

@AndreCarter i rearranged my plan and am doing august now too...good luck to us both

correct and -19s lfggg

really wish paper PTs had a way to blind review #feedback

who else taking the june lsat...i feel behind

@JohnThorn agreed

hey 2 ppl here

@SarahHolmes754 i get caught up in the words a lot, but drawing triple venn diagrams really helps me lol. a lot of the invalid arguments of this flaw section of the curriculum is based on the fact that the "B" bucket could be huge. Therefore, if only "some" or "most" of B are C, A could have a real good chance of never being in C, which is why those conclusions are invalid.

@Scascio thats how i did it

@MateoAgudelo the answer is SOME pilots are blind, which you're saying extends to ALL pilots are blind. (correct) and ALL pilots are blind is negating the initial "NO pilots are blind." because we're trying to get the bare minimum to negate, "some" is correct, even if it encapsulates "all."

this is so hard to explain but i totally get what you mean lmao

@OwenTrela because "some" ranges between 1% to 100%. it encapsulates "all" which would be an incorrect translation