EthanMadore
Admissions CoordinatorThe 174s+ that got Rejected from Harvard (Plus, make your appointment with the application doctors.)
On this week's 7Sage LSAT podcast, we check in on some excellent scorers who got rejected from Harvard last year, talk about how AI is reshaping law school admissions, and dive deep on Jo's file, a high scorer in search of RC consistency. Check it out!
If you'd like us to feature your LSAT and admissions questions on the pod, you can submit your case here:
https://docs.superhuman.com/form/Podcast-Submission-Form_dxNh_ZuZcNP
If we select you, you'll get three free months of Live, an Essay Workshop, and expert advice from two LSAT masters, 7Sage's admissions coordinator, and a Yale JD.
18
12 comments
A 174 isn't necessary nor sufficient hehe
@beepbopboop probably necessary unless u got a urm/t1 softs
@JerryTianleChen By definition that makes it not necessary.
@ZaneClezie for most of us we can't change our softs too much so I think it would be necessary for us right?
Well, yeah, let's be real, if I'm an admissions officer and I can tell that someone's essay is written with AI, why would I care what their LSAT is if they don't put a bare modicum of effort into showing me that they want to go to school at my establishment?
Man even a 174 ain't enough 😭 how cooked are the rest of us
@JerryTianleChen very much so lmao
@JerryTianleChen No, trust gang 😂💯💯 We’re gonna make it 😂🔥
ugh, if I am cooked, stick a fork in me. I am doneeeeee
Loved this. P.S. I agree art passages are booooooring as hell
Is 7Sage attending every LSAC forum? Namely Toronto? 👀
Hi , I live in USA now, but I was born in another country in south America. My degree if from my home country. That would make my application more difficult? do I even have a chance?