@RyanSD Same. If it's "generally unknown amount contemporary critics..." then it doesn't change the fact that the Latina autobiographers were the ones that were known and happened to revolutionize the genre.

@victorsplitter27 Same! It takes a second to get used to, but I feel like it's easier. It's easier to remove highlighting as well

@haena Just tried it out and you're right! It works for drills/sections now I believe. Thank you

@avamcnevin12 Yes @J.Y.Ping can you guys add the feature to drills/sections please?

The highlight function is not working for me. Is this the same for others?

The first paragraph of this passage destroyed my brain

@arose I don't think the author is disputing that the red bloom happened in October. So in that sense, the author is accepting the evidence. He just adds his own evidence in addition to it.

For Q12, I thought A concedes that there isn't exact objectivity when the author says "While it may be true that different agencies require different degrees of correlation before permitting a positive identification"

Omg but if he still examined ALL of the films that are STILL AVAILABLE......I- nevermind

@LastFirst Yes. I think of it as like ok, even if they have poor hearing, the stimulus basically still says that the birds' sounds were still shrill enough for the predators to hear them.

What the helly are parking patterns

Isn't B still conceding the fact that they still produce more stress as a result of trauma? Aren't we supposed to weaken that?

Gosh, I really overthought this question...

@HollyShulman In this answer, you say that "if we negate the negated 'good communication' and slide it in the necessary condition spot..." If we are putting good communication as the necessary condition, how are we negating it twice? "Unless" negates the SC. Why would it negate the NC again?

Are there other questions that are similar to this? I feel like this missing assumption/flaw in this argument is kind of niche.

@chrisabulia What word did search via ctrl F? Mechanisms?