@JustinWu04 ya agreed would love to know cuz this is such bs to me honestly like ....i dont know how we can say this one is correct

could you not say that there is a pretty clear assumption that one either has membership and uses pool or doesn't and that they are assuming that there is no other option (that you could be a member and not use pool) and that is why c is correct, they assume there is no other alternative?

how can you conclude that schools will not survive without it being implied that it is possible (??)

can someone link the lessons i should review in conditional logic he is referencing

i feel like i was breaking the logic that unaware links to involuntary and thus the argument falls apart. whereas d introduces an idea of control that was never part of her argument, she did not argue she could not control the humming, just that it was involuntary

I feel like the explanation against c in the video does not disprove it... if scientific understanding's pervasiveness is affected but not impeded then are we not getting the exact same idea as a just in other words? it will continue to advance but not at the rate it could without the former phenomenon

this still makes no sense to me after watching both explanation videos, kevin says that if you read the statement as "any social system" as in every social system will become susceptible to change in values w labor saving technologies because there is a chance in which the left side of the conditional doesn't happen (introduction of labor saving technologies), yet c gives us an example in which the left side of the conditional is happening - the technology is introduced, the system is just not susceptible to change, yet still, how can we infer that this social system not susceptible to change somehow does not fall into the bucket of any social system... i cannot wrap my head around this one

anyone else confused on how we can say she "avoided the sentimental excesses of novels she read in her youth" - to me it just states the local colorists but never really tells how they are different

@nnkNewYork agreed... felt very much like the authors opinon...

wait what the hell

@EmoryMcDowell agreed this is exactly what happened to me

how important is it to really identify the names of these arguments do y'all think?

is there not a mistake in this explanation? when he writes "Similar to (A) and (B), we can move on as soon as we recognize that (C) has costs outweighing the benefits." even though right above he writes "While (B) illustrates the principle of cost-benefit, it lands on the benefits outweighing the costs." am i missing something here?

I am not entirely clear on why we know the second half is the main conclusion, and not an example supporting first statement

what makes something different from a sub-conclusion versus a statement? i got this correct, but only poe, in my head this is actually a sub-conclusion because there is evidence to support it?

@LiviaLSAT like political structures don't bring about ecological or climate factors so why would the arrows go both ways

i am still confused why you know that its a bi-conditional relationship, maybe need to find that lesson to review.... but anyone else lost here?

reducing class size (thus) hiring unqualified teachers would improve the achievements of any students completely negates the argument no? i am so lost on how to make sure d is wrong here

@LiviaLSAT i went hunting, its resolve reconcile explain if anyone else was curious ... i do think it would be helpful to restate full names

what is an rre question .... these acronyms are killing me

i got e correct , but once i watched the video it is much more compelling that if we were to negate c that it would genuinely shatter the argument... i know that it doesn't go by the rulebook of structure etc etc but it is quite annoying that if you do the negate rule e is actually way weaker and c would make a ton more sense

i am so hopeless at lawgic i just don't cant map these correctly to save my life

it is just as possible that the actor did have a copy of hamlet as a spectator was obsessed with a certain actor... the only way to choose this answer is with outside knowledge of 17th century printing habits, which goes against everything we have learned about outside knowledge? idk this one seems like a stretch to me

this was for sure hardest in the set imo...

should i press show question and try myself before watching video or does that reinforce bad habits since i havent learned concept yet?