Personally, whenever I get stuck on a sentence of the stimulus, it won't make sense no matter how many times I reread it before I move on.

The advice of "don’t read further if you don’t understand the line you just read" isn't always feasible. The context you get from the other sentences can often help!

@mattrettig I find that every time I go against my "prediction" the answer is wrong because I start overthinking. It's a slippery slope that's different for each person

@ryanbshort I was thinking the same! If the split was truly "random" then there's no control over the diversity within the groups.

I was so confident going into this one... I got humbled

But because "some" is weaker than "most", wouldn't that actually help an argument in this case? If "most" violinists aren't exceptionally good at playing the violin, I'm struggling to see how changing "most" to "some" would be invalid just because the "most" argument is invalid.

@kmartz I keep waiting for them to just start not making sense it seems too good to be true lol

I feel like the instructions for this exercise weren't clear at all. I understand what I'm reading, but like, what am I supposed to do here?

This makes sense so far. I'm waiting for something to hit that throws away all that sense.

So then does it not matter which side of the arrow the conditions go on?

Would

Yoda-T <-> Luke-J and /Yoda-T <-> /Luke-J

still be correct?

@Raisethescore So I just went against everything I ever learned about studying and just powered through to other sections and it actually started making more sense. It definitely helps to make a cheat sheet of the groups and their indicators and rules to have something to quickly check as you drill tho!

Do the sufficient conditions always come first in the

A -> B? I've been treating A as always a sufficient and B always as a necessary, but these exercises are making me think that's wrong. If that is wrong, how do we know what poses as "A"?