I hate it here

If only 36% of people get a question right it should be SCRAPPED

...what

I actually had no idea what this question was even asking

Call me boo boo the fool with how I acknowledged the EXCEPT and simultaneously subconsciously ignored it

@monmon this stim just made no sense whatsoever. Felt like Charlie from It's Always Sunny trying to diagram this one just to digest the material :')

I genuinely did not even realize there was a hypothesis in there, chat I'm cooked

@16dnholli No I did the same exact thing, then rereading it in BR made it click

@pamelajkok Literally did the same exact thing

I'm confused on why A is correct. "Robbins must be able either to dismiss it or to praise it." Doesn't that mean she can dismiss it? And bc of "or," Robbins only has to meet one of the criteria?

Solve my riddles 3 type question this pmo

Can someone point out where it states/implies that plants can function without the secondary substances? Am I supposed to assume that from "[secondary substances] have no known role in the internal chemical processes of plants' growth or metabolism?"

@ratman23 The answer is E. If the news media started reporting violent crimes more frequently, the public anxiety would increase, despite the crimes happening less often. A could potentially offer an explanation as to why violent crimes decreased, but doesn't address why public anxiety increased.

wdym this is only level 3 difficulty

Nah bc how did I get a 0% I'm cooked

@Tombee64 we struggle in solidarity over here

@zunair No bc I am fighting for my life trying to lock in to this rn

This was so much better than the last passage

@Ssss No this passage absolutely SUCKED

ouch

...I guess I actually don't know how to read

Timing is gonna be the death of me for the RC sections I fear

Ugh I was looking for the answer in the second paragraph and that's what had me go with A

@JaymeBlazek i don't think there's a wrong way to do it as long as you see improvement!

we did it Joe