#help

When dealing with "the argument is must vulnerable to" questions are we looking to attack the premise or the conclusion?

does anyone have a method for these questions? I don't know what im looking for or if there are any indicators to know the right answer? im so lost

Every time I get an answer wrong, I go back and read the stimulus and realize I interpreted 1 word or 1 sentence in my head into meaning something else and it kills me. because if I just read it right the first time, I would've clearly gotten the right answer.

the last TWO modules have kicked my ass

omg these lessons make me overthink these so much. these should kind of be common sense and now im getting mad.

wait im actually about to crash out

Im gonna cry.

I think im FINALLY starting to get these. get the premise. then conclusion then find the answer that finds the commonality between them is what's working for me. I wasn't doing the lawgic before because I didn't think I would be able to identify them right and risk getting the wrong answer but as long as you have the conclusion right thats half the battle and a good start!

I'm so confused. it says without their CODEFENDANTs counsel present. not their own. it never said they cant have their own present and it only talked about how they won't make them find a new one because of them sharing a counsel so I would only assume it would be against some rule for the counsel to hear both questions. im lost.

this might have just been the absolute WORST explanation and strategy I have ever seen.

I feel like these are being over complicated in the video by bringing in a bunch of other language.

omg this pissed me off so bad

omg bye

This one was hard. I feel like vocab was a major factor to me getting it wrong

so causal arguments can not be true or valid, JUST strong or weak

this split method is literally changing my life bye

this method is insane

this was fairly simple

so "Some" is one of the safest options (depending on the context of course) but for the most part it is the broadest range and can help to understand as long as you know the boundaries of the others

wait but didn't the last lesson just say some does not equal most??

xY

but

x-m->/Y

is what the last lesson said no? was I confusing m as Most instead of Many???

#help!!

wait. but Some can be equal to Most. because Some could mean 1-100% and Most can mean 51%-100% so if:

x-m->/Y (Most x are NOT y)

how is that possible. what if it is 70% of X is Y. that would imply most AND some. Therefore, most of x (above 51%) IS equal to Y.

please help

overwhelming majority = more than most 51%-100%

most = more than some OR equal to some if some falls within 50%-100%

some = 1%-100%

k

NOOO I saw the word research and immediately crossed it off without reading the rest of E ugh

this is how I find out invaluable means VALUABLE.