Hi,

I live in Brampton and taking the June LSAT. Anyone in Brampton willing to study together?? Please let me know!

Thanks!

I’ve been splitting my time up between studying with 7Sage and the LSAT Trainer, and I have found the LSAT Trainer to be very helpful so far. That said, I prefer 7Sage’s approach to logic games so far.

Does anyone who’s familiar with both have any advice regarding whether or not I should skip over the LG sections in the LSAT Trainer? Would the LT complement 7Sage’s system, or would I risk confusing methods?

Any advice would be much appreciated.

I am looking for a dedicated study buddy in Orange County Area.

I live around Irvine, and am prepping for September 2014 test.

Anyone who would like to join me, please let me know!

After going through the 7Sage course, how many months should I spend working on practice tests, blind reviewing them and going over my weaknesses etc.?

is there a difference between the old lsat preptests and the new preptests. I took my lsat in february (did quite good) and i mainly studied from preptests 1-38. i'm just curious as to what difference there is for the newer lsat 39-60. is there a difference in the logical reasoning?

On the test day is the bubble sheet detachable from the test booklet? So far I have been PTing with the bubble sheet detached and on my right side while my test questions on my left side. It suddenly occurred to me if that is possible on the test day? If not, how would you guys go about it? Thanks!

Hey guys, I'm currently living in Seattle and looking for a study buddy. If anyone from the area is interested let me know!

I work full time near Grand Central. I'm free on my lunch hour (generally 1 pm -2 pm) and after 5:30 pm. Scored 167 on my first LSAT, looking to retake in Sept! Aiming for 172. If you're around this range, looking to take in Sept, and in the city- message me!

Hi everyone! :)

I'm looking for an online study buddy! Or someone in Tulsa, Stillwater, or OKC. Taking the exam in September. Cold diagnostic was a 156, aiming for mid 170s.

Email me? monica.kreymer@okstate.edu

Good luck!

Hey everyone,

Just wanted to gain some insight on how others are tracking their progress. I currently use a pretty old school method, simply pen and paper (agenda) to keep track of what my goals are to get done each day, what I actually end up completing, how many hours I put in, and additional comments for notes or reminders.

What do you guys use to keep track of your studying? I know there are LSAT analytics or other excel based methods for PT tracking, but what about for those who aren't at the PT stage and would like to keep track of how many hours they spent drilling per week with notes maybe explaining why 1 session was longer than another. Looking forward to seeing what everyone else does.

PS: if anyone has a great online/excel based method for this type of tracking, would you be willing to share it?

Thanks,

Christian

This has happened to me at least twice now. The first time thought I had just messed up but the second time it happened was quite sure I entered into the right box. It happened in Firefox 30.0.

I don't want to spam the comments or I'd just double check real quick myself. Happy to provide any other info.

Here is what I did:

1) Post a reply to an existing comment on a LSAT Explanation.

Like this one here: http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-1/#comment-18875

2) After you post that REPLY edit it within the 5 minutes (not sure if this is part of the bug, but I did this in both instances).

3) In the box at the very top above all the other comments, the one where you'd normally post a comment that is NOT a REPLY to any other comment, post a comment in there.

Expectation:

I'd expect posting in the box at the very TOP above all other comments would post a top level comment.

Actual Result/Possible Bug:

It posts it as REPLY to the comment you replied to in step 1. Not as a general reply to the explanation.

Which should you follow the syllabus or the study schedule. They both seem to have different study guides.

not sure if my green checkmarks have been unchecked or new materials have been added...

Hi I live in Southern OC and have been studying for over 3 months. I am getting ready for the LSAT in sep. I have done about 85% of material, 40% prep test and about 20% of core curriculum. Let me know if we can get together. 949 302 0909 Aidin

Hi all! I am looking for a study buddy for the Sept 2014 LSAT! I live in Hacienda Heights, zipcode 91745 and can drive to meet up with anyone if needed. Given experiences, I prefer studying with someone who is scoring in a similar range as me (mid 150s). Email if interested at awtu@ucla.edu!

I recently started the LSAT starter and have not had any prep tests, besides the one given in the trial. I've looked through the syllabus and do not see may prep tests, until the end of the program. Shouldn't there be prep tests throughout the starter program?

http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-10/

I am confused as to why A is the answer choice and not B.

According to Kaplan, they say if A is correct then it'll be a rare candidate who takes a chance on the authors strategy, as the media may only air the opposition and disregard the later support. They further that by stating that media is a huge part of national campaigning. But wouldn't that be an outside assumption we would make. And aren't we only suppose to take what is given within the stimulus to support our answers? Because that is why I disregarded A as an answer, thinking who cares what the media covers because it doesn't limit the SPEECH, the speech is still given and still heard from those attending and such. Where as if you choose B if many people do not find politicians in the first place then that would make practically any strategy they choose ineffective, no one trust them... Can someone help me where my thinking has gone wrong here?

I have been at times confused about the exact meaning of attacking a premise.

When a stimulus includes a study that says, for example, most people with certain genes hate apples in a weaken question, if an answer choice says "some studies show that most people with the same genes do not hate apples," this is considered as attacking the premise, right?

But if an answer choice says something that implies that the study did not include enough people to provide a legitimate level of support, it is not attacking the premise.

Is it a correct way of understanding the concept of attacking a premise?

I was working on PT33 LR Section 3 Q.8. The stimulus starts with "Most people invest in the stock market without doing any research of their own." Turning it into Lawgic. At first I did "People research/ -most-> invest" But my instinct says "Invest -most-> research/" is also right. Because when I ask "what do I know about these investors?" The answer I get is "Most of them do not do research."

However, the conditional Lawgic rule states "without=sufficient negation."

I am sooo confused.

Can anyone help me?

Any general tips will help ! I have yet to see any improvements after studying a month

Hi all - I'm taking the LSAT for the first time and I'd love to find a study buddy to stay motivated and on schedule. Let me know if you're interested!

I saw this clip on YouTube about the death penalty and I thought it was really interesting and something us future lawyers should think about...

LSAT

Hi there,

I don't want to waste the problem sets so I can return to them later, but I want to make sure I'm getting the most out of them. How many problem sets should I do before moving on to the next lesson?

I'm sorry if this was answered elsewhere, but I couldn't see the answer anywhere!

Thanks!

Looking for a study buddy in Nashville! Hit up this post if you'd like to discuss.