- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Has anyone else noticed drastic differences in accuracy between their initial attempts versus their blind review? I just finished an RC section scoring 7 less incorrect answers on my blind review compared to my first take and this is not an anomaly.
I was wondering whether anyone was able to bridge this gap and how they went about doing it.
Couldn't there also be the possibility that there are more pin-tipped etching tools than bladed etching tools? That would be a sufficient assumption to guarantee the conclusion.
@clarktoo I am on the same wavelength as you. What I found to be beneficial as an alternative to mapping is just highlighting. I leave context and irrelevant information blank, highlight indicators one color, conditions in another, and premises/conclusions with another (depends on the question type).
So we are required to assume that intention is a facet of fraud? Isn't that completely counterintuitive to everything that 7Sage teaches about not assuming anything that is not written in the stim?