#help im rly confused on how to answer these type of questions and what strategy to use cuz all the answers seem right to me LOL

this video was way too quick and didnt explain enough why other answers were wrong. how is B right and not E?

#help, i chose C, how is E correct?

how do i test to see if it supports to conclusion or not.

# help why isnt B correct?

#help how is the conclusion the first sentence if it talks about other peoples opinion and not the surrealist?

so when we see "thus" we should not think that lead to the conclusion?

#help i keep getting 3/5 questions right. should i keep drilling until i get them all right or should i move to the next lesson?

can someone pls explain how to use the blind review method in these lessons.

for those who picked A, can you pls reply using the wrong answer journal template. thanks so much itd be very helpful

what makes a some before some argument valid?

does the some statement need the same starting point in the second sentence as the first?

for example:

1. Some almonds are grown in California.

2. Some almonds grown in California are properly categorized as a fruit.

and does the some statement need the second sentence to begin with "all" to be valid?

for example:

1. Some almonds are grown in California.

2. All almonds grown in California are produce.

so basically statements that start with "all' are invalid ONLY IF the next sentence begins with "some", "most", etc? or is it that all statements that begin with "all" are invalid?

#question:

is this used for logic games or for LR too? if so how

#help

for the part that says "Negated: No unicorns poop rainbows. U → /PR" why isnt it /U->PR?

why is the negated example in the review section "A and /B"? what does the AND mean? where does it come from? how is the "and" written out in a sentence?

im really confused on the last couple of lessons (kick it up in the domain to embedded conditionals). can i skim through these or do i need to understand this for the lsat?