User Avatar
CDB
Joined
Sep 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 165
CAS GPA
4.0
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Boston College
In process
Cornell
In process
Duke
In process
Emory
In process
Georgetown
In process
George Washington
In process
Georgia
In process
Harvard
In process
Northwestern
In process
Temple University
In process
UChicago
In process
UNC
In process
UPenn
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Wake Forest
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
CDB
4 hours ago

2/5 on first try and BR...sigh. I hate NA

1
User Avatar
CDB
7 hours ago

I only get these right based on POE. It's not that reassuring because it would be nice to know how to get to THE answer, rather than narrowing down my options by eliminating what I know is wrong.

1
User Avatar
CDB
9 hours ago

I prefer SA over this because wt--

1
User Avatar
CDB
Edited 4 days ago

I work 40 hours a week (9-5). I study 2 hours daily from 7-9pm (after the gym and decompressing for balance) on weekdays and 2-4pm on weekends, which has been quite doable honestly. 7Sage + Google Calendar + consistency/discipline has saved me! Rest is key (7 hours of sleep and hobbies throughout the week for personal sanity)

13
PrepTests ·
PT130.S3.Q20
User Avatar
CDB
4 days ago

So it's NOT okay to assume that alienating customers, which, in turn facilitated their inconvenience and disliking towards supermarkets is not good for business, but we CAN assume that such alienation (e.g., walking to the back of the store) tactics are manipulative? The assumption in E seems to be a heavy assumption, and if you agree with that, I would argue B is also a heavy yet understandable assumption. I was stuck between B and E because I understand both, but when to apply assumptions to this question seems to be quite unclear.

1
User Avatar
CDB
4 days ago

first 100% :)))

1
User Avatar
CDB
6 days ago

I only got this right because I needed to look up with deleterious means lol. Whoever made this question...I wanna talk.

1
User Avatar
CDB
6 days ago

I don't understand why it's not C when, according to the stimulus, the cost of the low-watt bulbs will ALWAYS cost more than the normal bulb. I understand that even if it's $1 more, the cost does nothing to the argument because it doesn't incentivize people to still get the low-watt bulb because it still costs more. I made the assumption that if the lighting industry makes more profit, then that would determine the homeowner demand of such bulbs, which would be helpful, no? lol. I got it right on blind review because I was stuck between B and C, but C seems immaterial because it does nothing, which is why I determined it to be the LEAST useful.

1
User Avatar
CDB
6 days ago

I feel like we're having to make a wild assumption that foraging is bad, which seems a bit of a hasty generalization. That's what messed me up.

2
User Avatar
CDB
6 days ago

@GotMilk? thank you for writing this :))

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?