User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Joined
Feb 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
2.76
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

American
In process
Suffolk
In process

Discussions

Lessons · YOU TRY: Implied Question (Greek Dramas)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Saturday, Apr 11

are people re-reading the passage? I want to have real analytics on how long it takes me to read the passages but by the time we try these questions we've already read from the passage in the previous lessons. unsure what to do since i want to work on my timeliness

1
Lessons · [OPTIONAL] Lesson 3 - An Art Museum's Collection (PSAr)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Friday, Mar 20

@IslamUmarov When the goat speaks i listen #roadto1000

3
Lessons · You Try - Hagerle's Sincere Apology (PSAr)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Friday, Mar 20

Someone is owed a sincere apology for having been lied to by a person if someone else has already received a sincere apology for the same lie from that same person.

This is such ridiculous sentence lol. brutal to read when in a time crunch

11
Lessons · You Try - Unhealthy Centenarians (S)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Wednesday, Mar 18

@JoshGaller same

1
Lessons · You Try - Automobile Thefts
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Wednesday, Mar 18

@ChandaM, but YOU are not making any assumptions. Each answer is a possible hypothesis; they each make their own assumptions. We just evaluate how strong the viability of truth is if the assumptions are true, but we are not coming up with any assumptions ourselves.

2
Lessons · You Try - Coffeehouses and Restaurants
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Tuesday, Mar 17

@GabriCox I try to map it out as I read. It's not automatic yet but I am seeing progress when I try to map it out immediately. Whenever I try to map it out after reading stim and possible answers I start losing it. I've gotten the best results when I start to map it out from the very beginning as I read thru the stim. Eventually, it will become intuitive and automatic.

we got this!!

2
Lessons · You Try - Economic Growth
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Friday, Mar 13

Does the timer seem wrong for anyone else? It says i got it in 26 secs lol 😅 maybe I'm just goated

2
Lessons · Lesson 3 - Job Loss
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Friday, Mar 13

tried to answer it by myself and got it wrong because I didn't take my time to notice that there was a period after "however", not a comma. interesting how such a minimal detail completely derails your performance.

4
Lessons · You Try - The Spring Cleanup
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Tuesday, Mar 10

@malop91 "Each of the many people" is an overcomplicated way of saying everyone.

Each of the many people

every single one of the many people

all of the many people

all of the people.

2
Lessons · Two Split Mosts - Formal Argument #6
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Edited Tuesday, Mar 10

Can I also say:

therefore, some A are both B and C

A<S>(B and C)

1
Lessons · Most Before All - Formal Argument #5
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Tuesday, Mar 10

the WHAT club???

5
Lessons · Negating Conditional Statements
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Monday, Mar 9

It is not necessary to be a Jedi to use the force

Is that correct? Flows better to me

1
Lessons · Quantifier “Many”
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Monday, Mar 9

@KhushyMandania no, however, an overwhelming majority of X includes most of X, but the same cannot be said vice versa.

I understand many to be more than some and less than most. maybe this helps idk tho lol

5
Lessons · No Contrapositives for “Some” and “Most”
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Monday, Mar 9

@FultonHoover can u explain further

1
Lessons · Bi-Conditionals
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Sunday, Mar 8

blue for luke green for yoda 😆

0
Lessons · Skill Builder - Rules and Exceptions (Embedded Conditionals)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Sunday, Mar 8

The explanations were not satisfactory in this lesson, there was way too much theoritical explanation and little practical lawgic.

Can someone let me know if this is correct for q5:

WHEN knowledge of fact is an offense, such KoF is established IF a person is aware, UNLESS the person doesn't believe

Rule: KoF is established as an offense if a person is aware 

R: Aware > KoF Est. 

Exc: person doesn't believe 

E: /believe 

2
Lessons · Rules and Exceptions
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Sunday, Mar 8

This just feels like an overexplanation of the negation lessons. Why not just take the rule and the exception as an exclusion conjunction and apply the flip/ negate strategy? Is there a reason this shouldn't be the most obvious solution? I got the same results as the video using this strategy... why do I need more options that are just gonna cloud my intuition?

10
Lessons · Conjunction (and)
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Wednesday, Mar 4

@KhushyMandania i think of it as two overlapping supersets, with the subset being the intersection between the two. the subset can only exists in the intersection, so without it between in both, it cannot be in either.

For A + J -> CF, I thought of it as two overlapping subsets within the same superset, and the member being in the intersection of those two subsets, then the same applies.

2
Lessons · Skill Builder - Chaining Conditionals 1
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Wednesday, Mar 4

Love how the examples always use dorky stuff, makes it so much easier to follow lol.

4
Lessons · Group 1 - Sufficient Condition Indicators
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Tuesday, Mar 3

@Mina.G

zombies attacking NYC will crash the real estate market.

in a situation where zombies are attacking nyc, the real estate market will surely crash.

the real estate market will crash after zombies attack nyc.

2
Lessons · Sets v. Conditions
User Avatar
CarlosHernandez03
Tuesday, Mar 3

@MadeleineLoyd i understood it like this:

Cat: G is part of C, C is part of M, because G is part of C, G is "triggered" to be in M.

Rest: NRO is part of LSI, because NRO happens, LSI is triggered.

They are equal in the sense that the sufficient condition triggers the necessary condition simply by existing; in the cat argument, the member is just a way to represent the superset triggering because of the subset's existence. In the restaurant, there is no member, but the subset still happens, and thus the superset is triggered.

5

Hi All, I started studying for the LSAT about 3 weeks ago, currently planning on applying for law school sometime around November, so I have 9-10 months to study. The issue is that I'm also working 40+ hours a week. Does anyone have any advice on how to schedule studying without burning out? I got 7sage with the intention of having a more structured study plan, as opposed to studying on my own. Any advice is hugely helpful! Thanks!

CarlosHernandez03’s study group
User AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser Avatar
8 members  ·  Last active last month
1

Confirm action

Are you sure?