@renejiang571 The way you phrased it to be "Household" made it click for me!! Ty

I have this problem too!! Highlighting what seems important (like stated by asherketchum) helps me. I have also removed all social media from my devices, all games, any distractions that seem to occur that limit my retention and attention span.

Instead, I now force my hobbies to be reading, drawing, knitting, something active too. I used to read a lot and got out of the habit, and reading will help retention and skill. As well as keeping your body moving a little, stretching, light walks. All help!! Though this isn't an immediate fix, it is gradual yet rewarding :) & I'm still working on it!

a. Law student -a-> reader

b. reader <-s-> writer

Answer choice C satisfies b. I feel this is the mot secure choice.

OR is it

a. Law student -a-> reader

b. reader <-s-> writer

c. Law student -a-> reader <-s-> writer

Law student <-s-> writer

This could make the answer be A?

oh my god i literally got this right and then I overthinked this and got it wrong wtf I need to stop changing my answer for this!!!!

I GET IT!!!! If the scientists ground for selecting problems was LESS NARROW, i.e. since they currently are picking a narrow selection of problems (Only selecting the problems they get right), then they would probably have a LOWER success rate if the problems they were picking was LESS narrow (i.e. if they had more questions they were required to choose from ,they couldn't pick and choose which ones they would get right.

I dont know how I didnt see that at first. It seems soooo obvious now

I kept reading B as SP not NSP UGH

weaken question ugh. I have to remember it will either do nothing to the argument OR weaken it.

I was right the first time and then changed my answer bc it couldnt be this obvious!! Crying

+1 min and 58 sec. The lesson before this really helped how I viewed this question. Very cool to see the lessons paying off! When I first started this journey I would not have gotten this question right at all! Very motivating :)

I'm sorry, DELETIRIOUS???? bsfr rn

@CecileJudy Just retook this, 4/5 as apposed to 2/5. I'm tearing up

5/5 but i was over by ~1 min 30 sec. :/

Why is the manager's argument flawed?

He states Liang's corporate division failed to me productivity goals for the year, and also states she is an exceptional manager. From what I instinctively gathered is that he grouped two separate instances together.

Okayyy the LSAT doesn't like us to group to separate things together that don't entirely correlate. and that is what the author did, he reached a conclusion based on one instance and not the other. That is a flaw in this argument.

Then by POE I marked out A because we don't care nor talk about different divisions of the corporation.

I crossed off B because what does that have to do with Liang not receiving a bonus? Like how does that even factor in here?

Marked off C because we are not comparing two groups together, we are looking at Liang and her group.

Well D seems right so far. He did reach a conclusion that groups her into a whole other group. This is looking and feeling correct so far. Not gonna eliminate it.

Eliminated E because we don't know if they had an unproductive year, we just know they didn't reach their goals.

This is my way of thinking and I am still working on if it correct or not lol

@Hnelson88 Well that adds up then hahaha!

Hi! I am currently aiming for the September 2026 LSAT but I live in the Outer Sunset. Would love to study together!!

Would love to be apart of this potential study group! I am shooting for the September test as well and am just starting to seriously study. I am following the study plan on the accelerated course because I have read some foundational LSAT books already and need more question practice.

I am around 3 weeks into the study plan and I found this lesson in a later section would probably be very useful to learn earlier on in the plan! Linked here: https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/introduction-to-logical-reasoning/logical-reasoning-cheat-sheet?sidebar=study_plan

lol today is one of those days where I have to log off, reset, and try again tomorrow

Honestly wtf :,)

I did so bad on this wtf !!! Ugh I was nailing all the others

Where's the stimulus lol

I swear this was an easy one lol

Subset: Plant 🌱

Superset: Rose 🥀

Being a rose is sufficient for being a plant. (Being a rose is good enough to be a plant)

Being a plant is necessary for being a rose. (Being a plant isn’t an option for a rose)

@saraknepshield937 This is fantastic, thank you

#3 finally clicked for me omg its been 30 minutes YESSS

The first question is tripping me out. How do we know that the passage is referring to the months before winter months? When it says “than they had previously” doesn’t that refer to previously as in previous winter months?

I put: Public places now vs public places in previous winter months 

Which did more people frequent on average?

Public places now

Help?