- Joined
- Oct 2025
- Subscription
- Core
WARNING: Do not rely on this list to imply causal and non-causal relationships. You will be wrong as evidence in the next Skill builder.
There needs to be more lessons regarding the diffrence between causation and correlation.
While the list of indicator words was helpful, it was sparse. There were indicator words - yet they don't imply a causal relationship. There are Non-causal indicator words that imply causal relationships.
I've been looking through comments about queston 4 to get insight. Clearly everyone else is having a similar problem as me.
You can't just tell us to use "Most before All" and then turn around and not use it. That just makes it more complicated then it needs to be.
Why are we being told to recognize the subject of our sentence as a condition. In MOST of these questions, the subject is being used as a condition (Q1, Q2, etc.). It just dosen't make sense when we've never done it previously.
That just makes it overly complicated.
Why can't we build the skill first by practicing it rather than jumpt straight into a test question.
You gave us 1 video on this
Okay, why do we not consider the connection in Q4:
/responsability - /tough decisions
tough decisions - responsability
But we consider this connection in Q5?
/9th level - /learn
learn- 9th level
The first one makes sense when I don't think about what he did in the previous example.
Late -> 5+ was written in that order.
Sunny -> Philidelphia. I follow the same logic but apparently it's wrong.
Switching the Subset and Superset is the only thing that makes sense here.
IF: 5+ -> late. (if you're 5+ min after bell, you're late.)
ONLY IF: late -> 5+ (if you're late, you're 5+ min after bell).
Half the time i think an object is the modifyer and the modifyer is the object.
Personally, it makes more sense to understand the subject of what the sentence is saying rather than the kernal. "Huricanes are triggered by Winds." In terms of saving time and understanding what the arguer is saying, the subject makes more sense than the kernal.