I'm confused as to why many doesn't mean most. Many people (for example) means that its above a certain majority, though why isn't it so in the LSAT? And why does categorizing it with 'Some' doesn't cause issues in logic if it isn't a true definition?

Wouldn't Hermes both like watching the Olympics AND like eating Wasabi? I dont understand how thats the only conclusion drawn

Im confused as to why the object is sometimes separate from the modifier and sometimes a part of it in the explanation

Is Question 5 "But this is not a sustainable, long term solution" representative of a premise? I put intermediary conclusion/subconclusion for this line.

15 is very tricky, and I only caught it in BR. Kingston distinguishes herself from the retention of precise sequences of words (like in western print media) in the middle of paragraph 3, saying that she is distinguishing her thematic storytelling method from the set-in-stone print method.

Nineteenth century means until nineteenth century? Got the answer right but maybe I'm just being pedantic with the grammar lol

Can someone help me understand why E was too general? Seems like the correct application especially since per capita consumption would be higher for children.