So in most cases is there always going to be a Answer choice B that nearly says what the main idea is almost* in many of these types of questions?

For these i kind of wizzed thru them only trying to identify words that would clue me into what the premise and conclusion would be. I got them right but is that the strategy to use for the LSAT? To wizz thru them fast just to be able to identify the premise and conclusion them move on to what the actual question is?

Can viewing statements from a IF THEN point of view help when it comes to identifying a premise and a conclusion? Or is there no correlation between a Argument and If then statements as of right now?

So to make sure i have this right. Premise: Not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet

Conclusion: After all, tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people.

So that is a example of something that is not a argument because the 2nd claim/conclusion is not more likely to be tre because the 1st claim/premise is not true?

For Question #4 after "However" how is that not the conclusion? Doesnt However in general signify the conclusion is after?

For question #3 how is " After All" not the start of the conclusion?

It would be helpful if all of the answer choices are presented and then the speaker goes thru each instead. Just starting by showing the correct answer from the get go makes it harder to follow honestly.

Try joining one of the classes. Those help me a lot cause there’s multiple people asking questions in real time and the questions are broken down better. But join it when it starts don’t just watch the recording just in case you do have a question or are still a bit confused about a topic or question.

How can i have my overall study plan include more of these types of questions that incorporate actual LSAT questions?