does this actually happen on the lsat, "Glitches: Once per section, you'll be disconnected for up to two minutes and must wait it out before resuming." Does it take away from your time?

Hello, I read answer choice E meaning that the "range" or location that tornadoes happen the most remained constant.

"The geographic range in which tornadoes are most prevalent has remained roughly constant since the 1950s."

If thats not what it meant then what does it mean? And then AC C i dont understand.

@letsacelsat can a tutor explain?

@DilyaraB When it creates the WAJ how can you view it after?

@flowerberry how can you view these after?

@Kvans17 Hey so with the WAJ what is your process with it? For example do you review all your wrong answers everyday? I have done WAJ but I don't find my self benefiting as much or at all. I tried Socratic and LSAT demons methods, but now I'm trying to review it by looking at explanations, videos, and chat without writing it down. Also, do you review all questions like drills and sections or just PT's.

@Kevin_Lin is this a good start?

Im interested!

is E not an assumption?

is AC b correct because in the stim it says," Human cognition alone cannot verify computer-dependent proofs." And AC b says,"We can never be completely sure that proofs relying crucially on computers do not contain errors that humans do not detect." Which translates to, " We can be sure that proofs relying on computers do contain errors that humans cant detect." Another question I have is how come we can take away the first 2 double negatives but not the last where it says, "humans do not detect."

I am, I'm wondering if its cancelled or not.

@Stas1973 god bless you. @7sage scenarios/explanations like this are helpful but you guys are already very helpful!!

yes!

Can unless in a necessary assumption answer choice always be negated to without?

Is this reasoning true? Saying its the most effective and then saying that another brand may be equally effective is not a flaw because it doesnt say anywhere in the stim that this one is the ONLY effective one, if it did then it would be a flaw if there was an equally effective one.

@haozhaogeng12 great explanation.

I got the correct answer Im just confused on this explanation and wished the AC had made an effort to say how many was built prior or how many there is in general. " This must be true. Like we identified in our analysis, the argument is assuming that there have not been enough large buildings built prior to or during those 5 years to make up for the ones that were demolished." Where anywhere does this imply there was not a lot built before the 5 years? I only understand "during" not prior.

Safari,". The Trap (What it does not mean)

The most common mistake testers make is confusing the "AND" (\(\land \)) with an "OR" (\(\lor \)).

• Having just A by itself does not guarantee C.

• Having just B by itself does not guarantee C.

• You must have both A and B present simultaneously for C to be guaranteed. [1]

Example:

• Rule: If you study (A) AND pay the fee (B), you will pass the exam (C).

• Scenario: You studied, but you didn't pay the fee.

• Result: You are not guaranteed to pass! The conditions were not fully met. [1]

just lost, throws away all fundamentals lollllllllll

@jimbob Thank you for this explanation, I know this was a while ago but does that mean the principle A+B->C doesnt always work and how can we identify when it doesnt work?