Just finished as well!!! I’m going to take a nap

Straight to In N Out

@Him go to analytics -> questions -> has notes

High 160s-low 170s scorer here. This question ran me over.

This is unrelated to your post but I use the note space on 7Sage for a "WAJ" because I'm too ADHD to use an actual journal. Every notebook, planner, bullet journal, and app I've tried has been abandoned within a week lol so I stopped trying to organize my wrong answers. I found that writing a whole essay to myself in the note section of each question works a lot better for my brain than trying to put everything in a journal. Maybe use the note section and see if 7Sage has a way for you to keep track of every question for which you've written notes?

One of my friends took 156 the week before her test and scored 7 points higher on her official exam than she did on 156. It whacked me, too, so don't worry. I would go over it again for review (if you want), but don't stress about it.

It helps me to start doing less new content and more review. I think looking over old questions is super helpful. The week before, I only drill 10 LR questions a day and one RC passage. I never score my last PT, taken the week before the test, because I don’t want a number to affect my confidence. So after doing my PT before test day, I just exit out without submitting/scoring of just not looking at the score screen. I tell myself I don’t care if it’s 150 or 170. I’m someone who will either beat myself up or be overconfident if I see a PT score close to the test. Everyone’s different but I hope this helps!

I still think C makes more sense

I got this wrong because I interpreted "not necessarily" to mean sufficient. It doesn't mean that. It literally just means not necessary.

I translated manners -> social, social -> morals. Totally wrong.

Not necessarily just means morals could be social or they could be not social. So you could break moral rules (be immoral) without ever breaking social rules (cause another person harm).

Yikes that took a few hours. It seems so straightforward now that I think about it, but when I was doing the question, I was completely lost.

I definitely thought D was referring to two different critics instead of two different beliefs being held by one group of critics, which is literally what's in the stimulus.

I literally wrote a grammar lesson to myself in my WAJ. LITERACY CRISIS? hah

@afk Thank you!

@AnnaVayser I’ll DM you

I scheduled mine at the “worst” rated testing center in LA to get a later date. All the better-rated testing centers in LA/SoCal only had early mornings on the first day of the exam. Hopefully I made the right decision. I definitely overthink

I dropped first year chem because of how it was taught and switched majors, so I guess I should've gotten this right. Graduated with a different degree. Wild question though. So many unnecessary assumptions

The phenomenon refers to the facts that the stimulus describes and the hypothesis is the author’s conclusion of why the phenomenon occurs. I used to struggle soooo much with them until I figured that out. They’re tricky because phenomenon-hypothesis not a question type, but a logical structure. Drill flaw and weakening/strengthening questions to get used to them!

@PowerUp_Tutoring thank you!

Great advice, thank you!

I guessed and got A. I don't actually understand this. Anyone want to help? Does "occurred independently" mean uninfluenced by others?

I ruled this out because I thought circular reasoning was never the correct answer in flaw questions. This is my first experience with it.

Well, this is depressing...

Well this means I need to learn how to do RC without relying on any highlighting. Thanks 7Sage though!

Under the Logic of Intersecting Sets section in the Lesson Library, there are a few You Try questions that deal with quantifier type questions. I just did one about Persian cats.

I'm interested!