It helps me to start doing less new content and more review. I think looking over old questions is super helpful. The week before, I only drill 10 LR questions a day and one RC passage. I never score my last PT, taken the week before the test, because I don’t want a number to affect my confidence. So after doing my PT before test day, I just exit out without submitting/scoring of just not looking at the score screen. I tell myself I don’t care if it’s 150 or 170. I’m someone who will either beat myself up or be overconfident if I see a PT score close to the test. Everyone’s different but I hope this helps!

I still think C makes more sense

I got this wrong because I interpreted "not necessarily" to mean sufficient. It doesn't mean that. It literally just means not necessary.

I translated manners -> social, social -> morals. Totally wrong.

Not necessarily just means morals could be social or they could be not social. So you could break moral rules (be immoral) without ever breaking social rules (cause another person harm).

Yikes that took a few hours. It seems so straightforward now that I think about it, but when I was doing the question, I was completely lost.

I definitely thought D was referring to two different critics instead of two different beliefs being held by one group of critics, which is literally what's in the stimulus.

I literally wrote a grammar lesson to myself in my WAJ. LITERACY CRISIS? hah

@afk Thank you!

@AnnaVayser I’ll DM you

I scheduled mine at the “worst” rated testing center in LA to get a later date. All the better-rated testing centers in LA/SoCal only had early mornings on the first day of the exam. Hopefully I made the right decision. I definitely overthink

I dropped first year chem because of how it was taught and switched majors, so I guess I should've gotten this right. Graduated with a different degree. Wild question though. So many unnecessary assumptions

The phenomenon refers to the facts that the stimulus describes and the hypothesis is the author’s conclusion of why the phenomenon occurs. I used to struggle soooo much with them until I figured that out. They’re tricky because phenomenon-hypothesis not a question type, but a logical structure. Drill flaw and weakening/strengthening questions to get used to them!

@PowerUp_Tutoring thank you!

Great advice, thank you!

I guessed and got A. I don't actually understand this. Anyone want to help? Does "occurred independently" mean uninfluenced by others?

I ruled this out because I thought circular reasoning was never the correct answer in flaw questions. This is my first experience with it.

Well, this is depressing...

Well this means I need to learn how to do RC without relying on any highlighting. Thanks 7Sage though!

Under the Logic of Intersecting Sets section in the Lesson Library, there are a few You Try questions that deal with quantifier type questions. I just did one about Persian cats.

I'm interested!