@TrinityLynn Yeah for sure, so cannot is a group 4 conditional indicator so it most likely will not appear in a statement. Let's use the example: "I will go to the park unless it rains" . Therefore my statement translated into lawgic would be.

/Going to the park --> Rains contrapositive /rains ---> going to the park. Translated back: If it rains, then I'm not going to the park. If it doesn't rain, then I'm going to the park. I hope this helps!

Yes, the "no" is already negating. You have it correct, don't worry.

This is such a bad explanation.

@ZuleyhaKumas It doesn't. That's the problem with the grammatical section on 7sage.

@JanPadilla Agreed Jan.

So in other words, assumptions are missing links between the premises and conclusion. Therefore, the strongest arguments have the least missing links between the premises and conclusion.

@BrandonChavez This is such a good way to explain it wow!

You could not have explained this in a more difficult way to understand. Do better.