- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
For #27, I did not choose A because I thought the sentence was mixed up by "Strawberry Fields" being in front of the T and S. Did anyone else have this problem? If so, how did you understand it was the correct answer? #help
Extremely frustrated with #16 on the grounds that the THIRD paragraph did not go into the doubts of that paragraph, in fact it never disputed it at all. LSAT test writers think they funny asf with this one ...
For #18, I chose E ('fuse together new particles'), what is the difference between E and B? I'm assuming its purely substance of the particles vs structures...
So, when a conditional statement is followed by an "even if", do we always kick that front part of the sentence into the domain? Please help, the phrase "even if" gets me confused if I messed up my lawgic, then my chances for the correct answers usually diminish.
So its not necessarily that A is not correct, its more so the fact that E is a much stronger answer choice?
For the 'resolve' question stem, should we look at our answers differently in the sense, "oh, this would fix this problem" or should we look at the stem the same as an 'explain' question. Not sure if I am making sense or not, but please help if you understand my thought process.
I am troubled determining if weak arguments are arguments at all. AGH
#feedback - If #2 did not have the 'consequently' at the beginning of the second sentence, would it not be an argument? And can we rely heavily on indicator words on the LSAT?
Okay, this is absurd. For question #21, answer choice D makes no sense to me. It says in the sentence, Planck developed a hypothesis and yet answer choice goes into us (the reader) not knowing his contributions? Is his contributions not the hypothesis?? Help lol.