- Joined
- May 2025
- Subscription
- Live
16-year-old college graduate who finally met his match when he first took the LSAT 😁
(please duke accept my application)
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Title pretty much does it. :)
I'm a reverse splitter (4.0/166), so I know I have to lock in with the rest of my application, and I've never really seen a good criterion for grading soft factors on the T scale. So if you guys don't mind, tell me what you think :)
Got my AA at 15 with a 4.0 and finished my UG in psychology at 16 summa cum laude with a 4.0 as well. Made the Chancellor's list/president's list in all my semesters, and I am doing an internship directly for an NC Senate member. I also worked in a graduate student/PhD-only lab for 3 semesters (at uni) and have about 3 years of work experience. I'm currently 17
If you take the time to respond I really appreciate your feedback, thanks!
@JudeBianouni edit: i commented this when my name was james mcgill now its my actual name lol
why do we have 11 questions in one passage :/
(is this representative of the actual lsat?)
I'm interested! I live in NC but I'd be more then happy to attend some Zoom meetings :)
I live about 10 minutes away from UNCC in Charlotte, NC. Looking for a study partner!
@a.ugonna Sorry I'm late, but here's what I think about it. I think that for those statements to be considered an argument, the only way for me to see that would be with "It really shouldn’t have caused a long estrangement." as the conclusion. I think that some of the sentences were unnecessary, though, and none really served as premises. There was a potential conclusion, but the lack of premises gave the conclusion no merit and therefore made the set of statements just that: a set of statements. The argument in question, with you seeing the conclusion as "Therefore, I hugged you because I miss you." makes sense, but it's implied that the incident with the toothpaste flecks on the mirror is not a reasonable means for a breakup or seperation, and I think that this statement overshadows the grounds for any other potential argument.
@Mary Now this is customer service!