Why am I still making the oldest mistake in the book!!!!!!!!!! Ugh so frustrating

Does this irradiation thing actually happen? Like what

I got it right in blind review after staring at it for like 10 minutes, so I just have to do that but in 90 seconds or so, super easy!

I chose E as well, and in my blind review I realized that E said that adolescents are still being charged, even though it's less severe. The stimulus wants us to explain a decrease in convictions, not the severity of convictions.

I did the same thing, I feel your pain

I got the right answer but I eliminated answers with faulty logic, so it may as well have been luck. I saw coffeehouses and restaurants and interpreted it as the two being inseparable, which led to me eliminating A, C, and E. I think I need to go over lawgic lessons again

I keep getting frustrated because I get the question wrong on my first try, then I get it right in the blind review. It's good that I am getting them right, I guess it is just a matter of having my blind review thinking while under time pressure. I guess my main problem is, when should I start worrying about time pressure? Is now (2 months in) too early?

It's translating from a conditional. Remember that "every" is a conditional indicator.

If we see that A is correct in a "must be true" question, should you move on immediately or look at the rest of the answer choices? I know that I will get faster with practice anyway, but when I did this I saw that A was right then wasted a good minute looking at the other answers.

Not trying to get overconfident but this is making a lot of sense. Hopefully this trend continues when I get to full questions!

Strong antibiotics fail to kill the bacteria that live in deep wounds.

The subject is "antibiotics" and the predicate is "fail", but this construction confuses me because of the last lesson with the cat drinking specific milk. In that sentence, I thought it would break down to "The cat likes" just like here with "Antibiotics fail". However, the other sentence kernel was "The cat likes to drink milk". I know we are only going for understanding, not deep grammatical analysis, but I think the answers should be consistent. Make them both Subject-Predicate-Object, because (based on my reading) I thought that "the bacteria" was the object of the above sentence

#feedback

Based on my understanding, I think so. The first premise still supports the idea that companies will shift to healthier alternatives. It definitely weakens the argument, though. I think the author is assuming that healthy alternatives will maximize profits. But, I may be bringing the real world into the LSAT world

Tiger: Not all cars use gasoline to move. After all, my mother has a car that uses electricity to move.

Disney: Noah must ingest caffeine every day. Some days he will drink a Red Bull. Other days he will drink a coffee. Noah never drinks Red Bull on a weekday. Today is Wednesday. Thus, Noah must have had a coffee.

Trash bin: A criminal was caught by a vigilante in Gotham city. Batman began his career in Gotham city. He was seen jumping across rooftops on the night the criminal was captured. He has captured thousands of criminals since the beginning of his career. My hypothesis is that Batman caught the criminal.