I Would like to start a study group. Planning on taking the LSAT in August!
@JiggityJack5 i think that would be the sub-conclusion as it is support for the main conclusion.
I find it so hard to use conditional logic for these types of questions.
yeah I still do because sometimes I am still confused about my answer
Can someone explain Q2 to me?
All trees are perennial plants with elongated stems.
I am not sure how it could be
tree → pre and estem
/pre or /estem → /tree
and not just
trees-pre
/pre-/trees
Would these two be the same thing?
I wrote:
Flowers-/bloom
bloom-/flowers
If it is a flower in the garden, then it does not bloom in the winter.
If it does bloom in the winter, then it is not a flower.
I feel like it is correct, but not too sure.
Basically, the conclusion is not valid because the second premise is a necessary condition and not a sufficient condition.
The "only if" indicates a necessary condition and not a sufficient condition.
If you are having a hard time understanding, try putting the questions and the example in chatgpt and it does a really good job in explaining.
Isn't the negation symbol:
¬
Please tell me if this is wrong or right?
Hey! im taking the test in october as well. Want to be study buddies?
Can there be a context, concession, premise, and conclusion, all in one?
conclusion: But only a small minority of contemporary north americans................... have had any significant exposure to these works.
these works=the operas of Bizet and Verdi
Wouldnt that be the conclusion?
I used that conclusion and came up with the answer choice C.
Guys, can #1 not be /H-/X?