I hate stupid questions

That’s why I eliminated it also and I feel like it’s valid on our end bc just an “understanding” is not the same as a thorough understanding

Maybe I’m overthinking but I eliminated A bc it says an understanding, whereas passage says thorough understanding which I feel like is different….

I understand now that he diagrams it but how are we supposed to figure this out when we don’t have unlimited time… obv we won’t have time to diagram everything out

SA questions prefer strong wording

This question is GENUINELY so stupid and so is the person who came up with this question

I’m an idiot idk how I didn’t see it sooner. She has met ppl who are one or the other, so assuming that’s true, it could be false that there is NO ONE who is either one. I thought FS the correct ans would be something that says ppl are both intelligent and wise so I think I got caught up in that and missed the correct ans

I’m starting to see a pattern that most “difficult question” are difficult not bc they’re hard to figure out, but bc the writers do something stupid like expect us to make assumptions or use very uncommon words that most ppl wouldn’t know the definition to. Super annoying and unfair

I guess I interpreted the passage wrong bc I thought she knew enough to dismiss it but not enough to praise it, but ig she doesn’t know enough for either

Ikr. They do something new with diagram each time istg it’s not consistent

maybe im dumb but im confused bc we only know ab ppl not feeling secure bc that’s what the passage talks about, we don’t know about ppl feeling secure. What if there’s more conditions for feeling secure other than knowing whether their actions are legal, but those conditions aren’t stated bc the passage is only concerned with when ppl cannot feel secure.

I got this right but at first I was confused with the passage when they mentioned government. I didn’t know if governments being liable means whether the city is liable or not.

Same I was in between C and E for a long time bc in order for C to resolve the discrepancy we have to assume that ppl aren’t maintaining maintenance. Idk I feel like it’s not a common sense assumption bc why wouldn’t u maintain ur brakes

Took me 4:56 but at least I got it right 😭

To throw us off 🙄

Me and I’m tired of this. Questions aren’t hard but the test makers were making the stimulus hard asf to understand and using words super uncommon that even Einstein wouldn’t know the definition to in order to throw us off, it’s unfair bc at this point it’s not even testing logic and reasoning, it’s testing ability to read and understand gibberish and taking educated guessed at words you won’t know the meaning of

Here they go again using words that even Einstein himself wouldn’t know the definition too.

But I hate this bc this shouldn’t be what’s making questions hard. It’s literally supposed to test our logic and reasoning, not if we know the definition of uncommon words and phrases. Honestly extremely unfair.

True, I feel like excluding more so means like not mentioning it since excluding = not included, and it was obv included so idk how B is right

So not knowing the difference between international vs multinational corporations is the reason why I got this wrong yet they say don’t use outside knowledge 🤡

I’m honestly SO over this stupid exam and them using words that most ppl CLEARLY don’t know the definition to. Honestly annoying AF

RIGHTTT I MADE THAT CONNECTION TOO… If wine led to a higher incidence of liver problems then the French wouldn’t be making the argument that if you want to be healthier (broad sense), drink more red wine. I feel like that’s a fair common sense assumption to make. But if you take healthier as meaning “lower heart disease rate”, then and choice B is irrelevant to the argument.

The only reason this question is hard is because ALL answer choices SUCK.

I don’t like B because it doesn’t even take into account the premises which talk about wine reducing heart disease. Ive been doing a lot of weakening questions and there are other questions where the right ans had to weaken both argument/premise, this one just weakens argument “healthier” and doesn’t even talk about the heart disease… this is getting annoying as heck bc it’s like they’re teaching a difference method based on the question even though it’s the same question type. I’m sick of these bs questions omg

i was in between A and B but both answer choices have issues honestly

When the explanation video is 10+ minutes I already know the question was STUPID for everyone else too