Got them all right and then did my blind review and switched my answers :(

@JamesVartian Sounds great

@JesselynMulet me too, me too

I am highly confused with lawgic, I had it and then took a little break and came back and lost it all.

I did not do that well, but after watching the videos I have a good sense of why that was. I am still getting confused on the No and Unless (at the same time) conditionals. Any recommendation to help me understand these concepts quicker?

I really appreciated this section, and honestly really enjoyed learning about the sentence makeups as well as the basis for different arguments. However, I am doing about 2 hours a day and only getting a few lessons in per. How much is everyone else doing, just so I can see how to pace myself. Planning to take the test in June.

Went 4/5 on all the examples. I am still not hitting the time I want, but it is a good start.

Got it correct, in about 30 seconds. However, the fact that I got it so quick and the length of the other answers choices made me pick the answer in 2 minutes 25 seconds. Any tips for speed?

4/5, the last one confused me a lot.

4/5... I am getting better with content but I am still slow with speed.

I keep getting a 3/5, any tips on how I can get 5/5's?

Valid arguments contain no assumptions

My list of strongest to weakest.

1. Disney - I put Disney as my strongest argument because each claim made had an extremely strong support by another claim. Each premise was lined up in a way that, by elimination led to a very straight forward answer.

2. Tigers - I put Tigers as my second strongest argument, because their are not as many premises that can be backed as support for the conclusion. If it had the same level of specificity that the Disney example had, it could have been a stronger argument. However, because the conclusion is very general it is still a somewhat strong argument.

3. Trash Bin - I put the Trash Bin argument as the weakest. I did this because all the premises do support the conclusion that Mr. Fat Cat could be the guilty party, it is not supporting evidence to give it complete certainty. If additional evidence was added that Mr. Fat Cat, was fed dinner around the same time as when the trash bin in the kitchen toppled over it could destroy the validity of the argument. There is too much uncertainty in. this argument.

Im excited, this is just like math

Good Luck Everyone