- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
dont waste an attempt if you have not reached your target goal. thats why its recommended not to schedule the lsat until you reach your goal. I would suggest you do not take the lsat in august, you only have 5 attempts. I started at 152 diagnostic and it took 6 months to see a 10 point improvement. 140 tells me that you dont understand the foundations fully yet. What made the biggest difference for me is trying to predict the answer choices, i started with Strengthen and Weaken and then moved to NA. if you can predict 160 shouldnt be a problem. taking the lsat is never "practice for the real one".
@alimccoll2026@gmail.com been studying for about a year. Full time work and full time undergrad. No kids. married. So 2 hours after work or school. Play video games, watch YouTube, watch tv.
I study and then I reward myself. I never study more than 2 hours a day, except PTs saturday. so if im done at 12pm. I have all day to chill.
predict predict predict. thats all i have to say. I still eliminate correct answer choices but its gotten better since I have been predicting
You shouldn't be tired after 1 section of LR. So I don't think that's the problem. For myself, when doing PTs, after 3 full lr sections, my brain is dead, so I hope that 4th will be experimental. I think your score is lower just because more questions are harder for you. ex drill has 1 na but a full section might have 3 or 4 na. Look to see if there is a pattern in the questions you miss.
@SaniqueRowe and when doing drills answer after each question, the explanations show that of the first question and not the correct one
C is correct because some = double sided arrow. if the some statement is after the all = no valid inference.
if you can create a custom drill and post it here in the comments so that we can practice what we just learned, that would be great!!!!
When clicking discussion or next in the CC it brings up the question again instead of the discussion or going to the next page.
Lsac only converts A+ to 4.33. if no A+ on transcript your A will remain a 4.00. on the explaining to law schools, i honestly have no idea, usually law schools understand this but at the end of the day they care about their median so try your hardest for your highest lsat score possible.
He explained this as the experiment rule but this is simply a hypothesis. The way to strengthen it is if we remove the causal factor and the event doesnt happen. (remove heavy metals… that means that they dont have resistance to anything). This is what B does. Its not about the experiment but more about how we weaken and strengthen the hypothesis and its simply by doing the three causal rules. B says that if we remove heavy metals… bacteria is not resistant to anything. Meaning that if we have heavy metals, the bacteria does have resistance which strengthens the hypothesis/conclusion. a causes b. if A is gone and b doesnt happen that means a causes b.
okay i understand when the sentance uses the indicator "or" but what if the embedded sentences dont use "or" how are we supposed to simplify the embedded conditional. and the example he gives, to me is more of a normal conditional with a disjunction in the necessary position. why do we consider this an embedded conditional?
why does the museum need a new exhibit hall? cause attendance fell and nothing else to fix it worked. Context does not provide support for the conclusion. But we see that the first sentence explains the why the conclusion is warranted.