Isn't "only" overly inclusive in answer choice A? that was my pick but I didn't because of only. the stimulus does not use that level of certainity, even after the first event does not occur

#help

If we get the answer right on first try and blind review, would it be ok to skip the video explanation or is it expected that watching each video (regardless of accuracy and certainty) is necessary for getting the highest score we can?

Also is there a video somewhere that verbally explains the curve function and LSAT scores listed above each answer choice with precents? The little blurb included doesn't explain it well for me.

#feedback #help

I don't see how answer choice c is already accounted for. Please explain. #help

Can you flag some practice questions that are similar to this right answer choice logic that we can drill? #help

Is there another explanation? I understand why the others aren't right but I dont understand why A is correct #help

What percent of LR is typically MBT and/or formal logic?

#help (Added by Admin)

This question is a good reminder to rely on the conclusion not the premise. answer choice b draws out a premise, not a conclusion. B is the support for why the 1st speaker thinks what they actually do! (

What question and PT is this from? how do we save to add into a drill?

I went for A instead of C....worth noting that words should be taken literal on LSAT? I understood "borrow" in the informal sense, which led me astray!

what if we were able to draw all valid inferences but did not do so using the lawgic? I have been doing so by parsing through the words. is that ok or bad practice? lawgic isn't resonating#help#help with me. is lawgic a necessity for the test?

Why isn't translating to the contrapositive a step in the lawgic translation process for this? Is it not needed?

#help (Added by Admin)

Are you a student or a tutor? how are supposed to know when there is or isn't more valuable lessons in the comments....this beta version is starting to worry me a bit with the inconsistency.

It only has to increase the likelihood that it could be true. Your hint is that the store owner is being "persuaded" by this other claim "so, we should try it" he concludes.