Any advice for an approach without diagraming?

Tricky tricky. Are there any sports that you would not be 'competing' against any other athlete? Even individual sports, you are competing against another athletes record, score, time etc.

@LowriThomas please elaborate what it has to be before last year. at 2.33 in the video, he explains that its possible to sell the trucks the same year as the purchase

Is it correct to say that this mistakenly uses the necessary condition as the sufficient condition?

Does anyone have suggestions for thinking through this problem quickly. The video makes sense, but we don't have 4minutes to discuss and draw this out.

@lawstudent0109 thank you, this was more helpful than the video

reasoning skills = general understanding

how does 'other than trees' play any part in logic?

@KevinLin thanks

@KevinLin So am I correct in understanding that we are not using the 'and' as a biconditional?

I really appreciate all that you have laid down in this post.

5/5 less go!

@MallikaMalhotra that could be a shot in the dark and risky

@KevinLin ok thank you

I came to the correct answer but it is not clear why 'x REQUIRES y' means that x is sufficient. Why is x not sufficient? why not: Motive ---> Change?

@TylerMadani021

1: This actor is not mentioned in another play. Other plays are not mentioned. Similarly: what reason do we have to believe that a firefighter in the adjacent town owns a copy. We don't. Its Reasonable to assume that the person with these traits would be an actor not a firefighter.

A is very reasonable as an AC. College is advertised as for both expanding academic interests AND discovering new ones. It also functions as such.

@lawstudent0109 'often buy' would suggest a 'significant role'

@KevinLin I figured as much and came to this conclusion on my own, but i was lost for a while.

The explanation for AC B would be applicable to all If-then statements including if-could. Any IF statement is hypothetical in principle. This is a stretch as an explanation.

I have yet to see a clear distinction/explanation between and 'necessary assumption' and a 'necessary condition' (right side of logic arrow). They seem to be used without a clarification on the differences in meaning or application. There is a little bit of confusion here. NA seem to be different in the use of analyzing the argument vs NC are clearly defined as the right side of the logic arrow.

Practice conditional logic, but don't waste time drawing it out in the test. Don't lean on your intuition but don't waste too much time.

@destinyMejia Except when we the answers require us to make reasonable assumptions?

@broenos most people would give up early if you put this at the beginning.

pay wall