User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Joined
Oct 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 177
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Yesterday

P: ignorant of interrelationships

P: Shouldn't let indifferent species die

C: We should try to preserve Max # of species

When I got stuck, I ONLY thought of what bridged the gap between the P+C

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
2 days ago

@ogreen26 this was me just yesterday, I wasn't thinking abstractly enough as a visual learner.

Think of every questions as an experiment.

Focus on the conclusion and the evidence. The correct answer will speak directly to those to things. Once you have the evidence and conclusion ask yourself "What new evidence would change this". Give yourself some examples- then search for the answer.

I hope this helps, I also struggled with main point questions until I started to ask myself simple questions "What does the author want me to believe

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
3 days ago

What is the conclusion, what does the author want you to think and what is the evidence for that. Then hunt for the answer.

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
6 days ago

3 hour update, currently getting 5/5 on my adaptive drilling with improved times. by reviewing the explanations :-)

2
User Avatar

Tuesday, Apr 14

SplitTip5PerCent

💪 Motivated

Adaptive Drilling knows all of my business LOL

I am 3 weeks away from completing the learning portion of 7Sage, so I went back to some older lessons to refine some concepts I'm a little shaky on- thus I came across a few newly embedded adaptive drilling. LOL they are actually a nightmare for me!

I drill pretty religiously and never delete my analytics. Most of my drills are randomized questions and not PT's, and 7sage saw allllll my flaws. This is soooo much better than drilling question types for me because most lot of my wrong-answer choices come from misreading an answer choice or forgetting the stimulus while going over the answer choices. I don't know how adaptive drilling knows this- but I've been met with those questions pretty consistently. This is pretty amazing and I am hoping that I can improve soon!

6
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Saturday, Apr 11

This is amazing! thank you so much! It seems like you guys are listening to learner suggestions and implementing them meaningfully. :)

4
PrepTests ·
PT122.S4.Q5
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Sunday, Feb 15

This was such a goof question and explanation! Needed to be reminded when to negate a conditional statement.

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Saturday, Feb 14

2/5 on my first attempt. 5/5 on my blind review in less time. This may have been mentioned- this is what got me to a 5/5:

Most Strongly (i.e. Easily) Supported Questions Types 

  1. Does not require an assumption.

  2. Does not improve the stimulus 

  3. Has the lowest threshold of proof.

  4. Does not have strong language.  (Always, never, all, none)

6
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Wednesday, Feb 11

1/5 correct. Drilling in LR and RC improved by 20% after learning this. lol, I'll review this again with a fresh brain.

7
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Friday, Feb 6

Got them all right, grossly over time. How long is going to take me pick up speed?

4
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Friday, Feb 6

This is really cool, starting to pick up on some patterns as well.

7
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Friday, Feb 6

Two split Most, or the tale of 51% :-)

5
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Thursday, Feb 5

Would this be better diagrammed in the beginning as

All->Most->Many/Some-> Few ?

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Tuesday, Feb 3

Some and most really threw me off when taking PT's. Understanding this language will help me quickly identity wrong answers.

2
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Tuesday, Feb 3

Wooooooowww so cool.

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Tuesday, Feb 3

Reading the question fully and chaining the conditionals made this very easy for me. I still need to practice to use De Morgan's Law because it's a gentle reminder that outcome can be and/or.

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Monday, Feb 2

@dylancameron814 didn’t even look at the lesson and it clicked because of your comment.

Wish they would have used this example:

Student are cited as late only if they arrive more than 5 minutes past home room bell.

Cited late-> 5+

John arrived 17 minutes past the home room bell. Can we logically assume John was cited as late? No. John got a note from his mommy.

Students are cited as late if and only if they arrive more than 5 minutes past homeroom bell.

Cited as late <—> 5+

John arrived more than 17 minutes late. Can we logically assume John received a citation? YES Your Tort professor will not accept notes from your mommy, or doctor or the psychiatrist you visited after finishing this lesson.

8
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Sunday, Jan 25

I asked CHATGPT to explain this:

"Tom’s recipe for lasagna is easy to follow for most people."

this sentence is about people, not about other recipes.

It means:

More than half of people find Tom’s recipe easy to follow.

Now look at the second sentence:

“Tom’s recipe is harder than most other recipes.”

"Tom's recipe is easier than most other recipes."

This is a comparison among recipes, not people.

10
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Sunday, Jan 25

@JohnThorn lmboooooooooooo.same.

2
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Monday, Oct 27, 2025

@ChrisBogle did you do the drilled sections timed?

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Monday, Oct 27, 2025

This cleared up exactly what I was struggling with on the drills. I'm really enjoying the foundation portion of the study guide.

10
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Wednesday, Oct 22, 2025

@NatashaChander-Levy Pull out the kernels first-then it will be easier to break down. I wrote my explanation above. The kernels will be a simple sentence that is grammatically correct- even if its just two words.

1
User Avatar
SplitTip5PerCent
Wednesday, Oct 22, 2025

This is what helped me. The kernels [subject, predicate and object] should be a grammatically correct sentence when pulled out from the complex sentence; Ex: Mary Simms declared.

Alfred Wegener developed a concept

The formation is triggered.

Except Here:

[A] study concluded. Even though A is a modifier, I still pulled it from the sentence. I didn't have to change the definite article to make the sentence correct.

6

Confirm action

Are you sure?