Hi! I received a 161 on my first LSAT. I am trying to figure out if I should cancel my score. I have the whole year to study (applying to the 2026 cycle), and aim to get in the 170s. In the eyes of a T-14 school, is a 161 worse or better than a cancellation on my record?
Thanks for guidance!
Hi! I received a 161 on my first LSAT. I am trying to figure out if I should cancel my score. I have the whole year to study (applying to the 2026 cycle), and aim to get in the 170s. In the eyes of a T-14 school, is a 161 worse or better than a cancellation on my record?
Thanks for guidance!
It would be great if you could help me close this gap! I can send timings if needed as well. All of my recent BRs have been between 175-179, but all of my scores are between 160-163. This was PTest 142.
Can someone expain how, if you write A out, it still proves false:
A:
OPTION 1: econ weak ---> /invest decreasing (original conditional proves this is false)
OPTION 2: invest decreasing ---> /econ weak (contrapositive conditional DOESN'T prove false)
Can someone explain this better for me?
Can someone reexplain why A is wrong? For the example he gave in the video: "Smoking tends to cause lung cancer" and an AC that says "many people who smoke don't have lung cancer," in my mind that would weaken the arg. While that is not a strong weakener, I don't understand how it is considered to not weaken. In that same sense, how is A not a weakener? @
Thanks!
