@ancavintu956 I am five years late but to anyone reading this in the future: the word "apparently" can also mean "seemingly" as in "in the appearance of".

Without a shadow of a doubt! As someone whose English was not my first language, learning the nuances of grammar applied to the LSAT increased my score a lot.

I suppose it depends on when the LSAT date is... But since you will have 12 weeks of only practice I would hold off on doing PTs until you have the grasp on the basics. Because doing questions, while helpful, only works if you can explain why you got each question wrong. At least that's my two cents and that's what helped me out, but you do you!

I found these amazing, the Sufficient Assumption questions helped me a lot!

@DillonTheVillain Fr hahaha

Congrats @AryanaRaval ! ... I hope LSAC gives me a surprise day on the test date with a +20 to my LSAT score

Wow, thank you so much! 7sage has been a lifesaver in my LSAT prep and now in my financials as well hahah

This will help me so much! Thank you

Congrats everyone!

@Tumptytumtoes Also keep in mind that the conclusion says garbage dumps do not harm wildlife, not the baboons specifically. The baboons were used as a specific example to demonstrate the general conclusion. So the hyenas population growing in a region with garbage dumps if anything strengthens the argument by showing that Garbage Dumps are not harming Hyenas, which is wildlife.

@MalvikaGeorge a bit late but for anyone reading for future reference: physical paper is not allowed on argumentative writing, only on the multiple choice actual LSAT.

Hey! Funnily enough I am in the Orlando area, shoot me a message!

You cannot use any keyboard commands in the actual LSAT after August 2023... So if you want to search something you have to, unfortunately, use the built-in text search bar at the top.

I would love to share! Do I post it publicly in the discussion board? How do I send it over?

Interested!

@MadelynRAndrews So from what I understood, and I got this wrong, is that "fundamental" in this case means primary. Ginsburg conceded that Western technology will not be neutral, but she disagreed with the main point in Weiner's argument, that such technology will cost indigenous peoples their cultural identity. So she disagrees with the fundamental point, therefore it is a fundamental rejection.

@Rena12345 I think it's because it's an automatic transcription of some sort from the video... That would explain why "AI" is written as "a I"... but yeah I had to read that a lot of times to understand what it's saying