Epic 5-star pull (Just took a 20 Q mixed drill and this was one of 5 max difficulty Qs smh)

@ogreen26 I think these types of questions require a much deeper understanding of the stimulus and ACs than say a conditional logic-heavy question. Take the jury question for example: You really have to sink your teeth into the stimulus to fully grasp the requirements they spit at you. Once you've wrapped your head around the idea that the average juror needs plain English over "legalistic language" in order to understand their job, you just need to head over to the ACs to determine which one goes against the grain.

Saw the word "delete" and knew where that one was going lol

So the hack of identifying the premise that is lacking support/explanation and looking for an AC that does just that is doing numbers for me

@MelanieGonzalez info in the ACs, like in RRE questions, are meant to be taken as true.

AC A's litmus test that worked for me was asking "How do I know that having perfect pitch is likely genetic? Well, it's because if I took Jim here (star athlete in 4th grade with no formal music training but perfect pitch "runs in the family") and compared him to Sarah (multi-state honor choir champion with formal musical training), Jim is likely to have perfect pitch (and so is Sarah, but most likely due to her musical background assuming she has no relatives with perfect pitch).

(A) boosts the weight of the support for the argument in showing that someone with little to no musical training can inherently possess (through genetics) the very skill that others who train their musical muscles strive for.