I appreciate these lessons the most as it gives me new/alternative meanings to "did not obtain" and "not appropriate" (so far) that I was not aware of for the purpose of the LSAT and have assisted me in getting future questions like this correct - the same questions I got wrong because I was unaware fo those alternative meanings.

EDIT: come to think of it, a Foundation lesson or LR lesson dedicated to such alternative meanings to the aforementioned words/phrases and those alike would be helpful and may save time for all. At minimum, it would conceive an awareness of these phrases/words and when we encounter them, indicate that they may have an alternative meaning. Sometimes I've come back to these lessons when I encounter them to be sure and often times, it answer choice I was thinking or stuck between but was unsure because of my unfamiliarity of such alt meanings. Thanks yall. #feedback

from what I can gather, while it does use "only", it is followed by "probable alternative". The info from the stimulus provides us with 2 probable options and out of those, only 1 is left thus how we arrive to A. Again, we can only use what the stimulus provides according to their line of logic. Just my take but hope it helps some!

same which is why I was stuck on this question. all of a sudden we are supposed to break a subset/group type rule to assume the word "trees" includes all plants lol

I agree to an extent. I also chose C because while the rest are relevant, I thought C was lease relevant due to the fact that the passage did not state whether or not its cost or anything financial related would be a concern in determining whether it was a viable way to gather the alt energy source.

agreed. one of the biggest downfalls of these "lessons". They're great but then watching a video we can't workout or follow in order kind of adds to the study fatigue because we aren't sure of what we are looking at and up against. #feedback

I think I eliminated B bc of the phrase "reduction of immune cells" and immediately thought well the reduction of (immunity) cells would not help in the way A-Acid is implied to do.

sheesh

besides the other comment, have you ever looked into being examined by a psychiatrist to see if you have ADHD, anxiety etc? or simply suspect you may have it based on patterns, others observations or past life events that affect focus? Perhaps accommodation for more time could be an option. (btw the timing thing happens to me all the time as well)

This has been a tough section for me but absolutely LOVE these explanations and seeing exactly where I went wrong and how to proceed/write/draw things out. More practice it is. Thanks #feedback

enjoying all these quizzes back to back for the sake of repetitiveness. per my #feedback earlier, it still would be helpful to have some quizzes, in addition to these, after the specific lesson.

#feedback agreed. or even more mini quiz sections between these lessons to at least practice what we just went over

great lesson #feedback

I had to "star" this. This explanation and graph helped greatly. #feedback

Thank you for this

Same. Some were laid out and others like the "which" questions, seemed to take away from the sentence and create missing context by replacing the word with the referential. A simple principle turned a bit complicated than what it needed to be.

@sofiajenina536 don't know why I'm barely seeing your response! So sorry. But yes, I am using this curriculum v2 and signed up for in-person classes here in Dallas, Texas (7sage as well) from Sept to Nov.

#feedback on these exercises, while extremely helpful, sometimes leave me more confused - not on the concept but the answers compared to mine. Sometimes I'll add all the modifiers and such I cant think of and that make sense to me. Then, based on the feedback, I'll try to make it simpler the next question then that feedback will have a lot of modifiers using the same strategy on the question(s) before. I see I have a good idea of the concept but sometimes it seems I may look too deep then not enough in another.

Overall, these practices are beneficial!

For the black holes one, I initially put that the word "existence" was a modifier of the term "black holes". In my head I was thinking, ok, they're puzzled by black holes and the term "existence" was the more specific part of them that they were puzzled by. I might have thought too deep about that one.

Same with 3.4. My answer was right except that I initially added and marked that the word "drastically" modified "improved". My thought was process was that "Drastically" built on the word "improved" and "1st quarter" modified "sales" as it gave a more specific timeframe.

I plan on taking it then and beginning extensive study beginning July 31. Hoping to improve my score from the last time! Good luck.