In the past few days of doing focused RC Drills, I notice most of my incorrect answers tend to be the 'Implied' question type. Any suggestions on what I should do to hone in on this skill and master it? Thank you!
- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Live
I am still not sure how we got this conclusion. I find it hard to keep up with the passage since I can't write on the passages like the explanation videos
this might have been the most confused i've been watching an explanation vid 😭
how am I supposed to practice low-res summaries if I cant draw on the test like he does in the videos?
what really tripped it was the "nonhuman animals", what was the point?
Why did I have to read the argument so many times to understand what it was trying to say??
I read the stimulus too quickly since I was. running out of time and mistakenly chose C, which strengthened the argument instead of weakening it
someone pls explain how I got a 100% on every you try, never retaking one, but a 2/5 on the drill 😭
I love it! Similar to blind review, I think it's helping build intuition, and it's nice when I either get less than my prediction or predict the same number I got wrong.
"prominent" but the best support uses the word "brief". That was my main reservation with this one.
Would you have to know what de facto economic segregation is to get this question right? I was between AC A and C.
I originally classified D as wrong, because I thought the part about brain disorders was just summarizing the last paragraph rather than the passage as a whole
I guess when thinking about a the tourist brochure my mind immediately went to history, but I guess this would be way too niche to go there lol
I originally said B because I assumed the instance of approaching a stranger was similar in both situations but needed to remember the distinction that the second situation was based on long-term friends
For me, I thought the nonsmokers served as proof for the theory behind the study. I think for these except questions, I need to think more black and white