I need this whole kick it up thing to be explained to me like a five year old😭

@Fernabkn1 what helped you?

@LiviaLSAT but for question 2 some goes to all

why couldnt suceed be negated in q.3?

why is brave not negated in #3?

I'd like to know how the inclusive example couldn't also be exclusive. What if he can only do poli 101 or econ 101 and not both, just like the chair example? How do they differentiate?

@Moffiemoff all group 3 indicators

@kaleighh.04 do the exponent form is only used when the premises illustrate a set! in this case homosexuality(h) is a superset of the subset of "plantiff make a showing that homosexuality is a immutable trait trait"

@ArmaniHunter05 this is how I interpreted it but I'm still not sure if its correct or not

For 5, wouldn't the referential of rights for the second group also be "to have artistic heritage preserved". I'm confused how we can jump to the argument assuming they will destroy it.

for some reason for 5, i wanted to compare very cold days to just regular cold days....could that still work?

For 3, wouldn’t the first referential be “successful economies” not just “economies”

I feel like question 2 isn't really trying to convince me of anything

What was the classic flaw in the stimulus?

this might have been the most confused i've been watching an explanation vid 😭

what really tripped it was the "nonhuman animals", what was the point?

I love it! Similar to blind review, I think it's helping build intuition, and it's nice when I either get less than my prediction or predict the same number I got wrong.

"prominent" but the best support uses the word "brief". That was my main reservation with this one.

Would you have to know what de facto economic segregation is to get this question right? I was between AC A and C.

I guess when thinking about a the tourist brochure my mind immediately went to history, but I guess this would be way too niche to go there lol

I originally said B because I assumed the instance of approaching a stranger was similar in both situations but needed to remember the distinction that the second situation was based on long-term friends

For me, I thought the nonsmokers served as proof for the theory behind the study. I think for these except questions, I need to think more black and white

how am I supposed to practice low-res summaries if I cant draw on the test like he does in the videos?