@Gregmjr I think they do as well. I've only gotten 5 star passages so far.

12/14 no br. Not fully interpreting a word strikes again. Why did I think Michelangelo was a contemporary. And can someone explain the difference between A and D on 11.

10/13 no BR. Someone please remind me to full read and interpret the question before moving to the answers!!!

4/5 only one I got wrong was because of wrong diagramming. I understand diagramming isn't for everyone, but for the questions that are testing conditional logic if you diagram correctly its impossible to get wrong.

5/5 we got this!

5/5. I think the key is really looking at the detail in the conclusion. We have to be able to decipher with how specific or vague the conclusion is. Because they will try to get us with trap answers that add in external details even if the conclusion is very specific.

4/5 I noticed that you have to be 100% sure of what the exact conclusion is if its not exactly stated. For those problems where you have to infer slightly if you intuition is off your doomed no matter what.

first 5/5 we got this!

Is the "in addition" how we get to two sufficient conditions in rule 2? Because I thought rule 2 would be only the second listed sufficient condition.

@HenryLehmann I'm starting to realize we're going to have be able to do this intuitively in the end. There won't be enough time to diagram the stim and the answer choices.