I'm wondering the same thing!

How are we supposed to cross certain answers off on the actual test? I am worried about having to go back and forth between the questions if I do the split method, and am not sure how I could remember which ones I've eliminated if I can't mark it. So far I haven't seen a feature on drills/prep tests that allow me to cross answers off, but I may be missing something? #help

LETS GOOOO first one I've gotten right in this section

Would a good way to think about this be thinking about whose perspective is being presented?

Ok so... because he isn't eligible since he doesn't have an exemplary record. In that case, saving someone's life doesn't really matter because he wasn't eligible in the first place bc of his record? help can someone explain this differently or lmk if I'm on the right track

On the actual test is it possible to highlight the text and write in the margins?

So is it the fact they are comparing the wrong things and not the fact that they are comparative statements that make B and C wrong?

So for Q3 does "no myths..." already indicate the negation with the word no? so the negation of the negation = the positive.

I guess since it says THE only not just only it makes it a sufficient condition indicator. The only can also be rephrased as "any"... that's the only way I can think of it making sense

I am also confused!!!

Ok I struggled with this one but then I thought of it this way:

You can make toast every day only if you have a toaster.

Bob has a toaster.

That doesn't necessarily mean Bob makes toast every day

Can somebody explain "only" vs "the only". In the last quiz #3 said "The only oral myths that have survived are the ones that were eventually written down" In that question, only was a sufficicent condiiton indicator, but why is "only" a necessary condition indicator for #3 on this one