language like 'absurd' scared me away from AC D here
So E is right because it implies there's overlap between the join the party group and the donation group, right?
WOOHOO I've been crushing this section. Kinda scary how things suddenly started to really click for me during this section. Hope I can keep this accuracy up in my actual PTs!
spent 4 minutes on a 2 star question <3
Was going to pick C with my gut but saw that it said "information" and not "research information" and thought that was weird so chose B. UGH.
Confused this question to be sufficient assumption...
I thought E was wrong because who cares if its from the seafood market as long as its farm raised?....
thank you for this i came here looking for this exact explanation. i reasoned the same way when i got rid of E
Lol, I missed a bunch of the questions in the lesson and 5/5'd it on the drill.
thank god i took intro to astronomy in college
I think naturally after seeing so many questions in the teaching portion, you subconsciously pick up on cues to answer the questions correctly once you get to the drills.
this is a rare example of a question where the two premises have a gap to fill, right?
I'm having trouble translating without claims back into english after using logic. For example:
"There can be no rule of law without individual freedom"
Negate sufficient: ROL ---> IF
But when I read this back to myself, how would I frame it?
"If there is rule of law, then there is individual freedom?" Is that what would work here? Please help!!!
Ugh. Explanation makes so much sense. I rushed through this one.
Yep this is what helped me rule B out
is it safe to assume that the reason why B is wrong is because of a mistaken reversal? Like, instead of A-> B, it says B-> A?
I find that JY contradicts himself a lot. The stimulus literally says the farmer has great concern for the environment of the cows, but then he goes on to say "well who knows if they really did have concern"... what??? Aren't we taught that the stimulus means what it says? I didn't find the explanation for AC E being wrong satisfactory. The word "key" is the only thing about AC E that seems to make it wrong. I understand why B is better, but please don't resort to contradictory explanations, it makes things more confusing.
I chose A and not B because I felt that the word never in B was too strong. B makes sense because it directly bridges the conclusion to the earlier premise statement.
this whole stimulus and argument are pretty weak, right?
I got this right but I think my reasoning for throwing out AC D may be wrong? Please lmk.
I thought AC D was wrong because it stated that no one whose enjoyment of life depends on associates and friends sharing the same beliefs... blah blah blah.
I thought AC D was wrong after reading this first portion because I realized that the logic is backwards. I didn't think Enjoyment of Life ----> having associates and friends sharing the same belief was the correct logical examination... maybe I crossed this answer off for the wrong reasons though.
This explanation is too wordy imo. D is right because when you take the contrapositive of the unless statement, it triggers the conclusion in the stimulus. right?
I think if AC B said that rashes occurred on both sides of their face after use of other devices, then AC B would be the correct answer.... lmk if anyone has any insight on that.