Nice. I get the one before this of easier difficulty wrong, but this of harder difficulty right? I am laughing at myself because how did I understand this one better than the previous one? I am genuinely so damn confused.

"Bazooka a ball at a kid and they be fine"

If it wasn't for JY's humor, I wouldn't laugh or smile while studying for this God forsaken test.

interested as well, insta: _gabecarroll

Is anyone mapping these out? I am curious because I am not. It comes easier to me than MBT questions for some reason. MBT will forever be an enemy and potentially final boss unless future questions give me more trouble.

Does anyone have tips on how to consistently map conditionals better? It seems I am having quite the trouble mapping out the conditionals in the correct way to be able to answer the questions.

Is it beneficial to ask myself, "Okay, that could or couldn't be true and we don't know for sure based off what I read in the stimulus" and then eliminate answers that way?

Also, will this apply to future question types and to even reading comprehension as well? I feel like it potentially could, but I am not sure.

My brain is f-cking spinning. I inferred Pat was not a member and still got the damn question wrong. Lmao, I need a drink.

Lord help me.

I chose A. Yeah, I know that I feel dumb, but I chose A based on the last sentence lmao. I see why B is correct and I chose B in the blind review, but damn. I don't know if I misread or what. I see why A is wrong and why B is right, but why in the hell could I not notice that when doing the question under time constraints?

"Big Monies"

In need for clarification.

Is this a valid argument form?

A > m > B

A > C

B ←s→ C

interested

In question 9, the conditional statement, "consumers should not presume that vagueness indicates an attempt to deceive on the part of manufacturers".

What is the sufficient and necessary conditions? Are there any indicators?

Question 14. Why can't we conclude that the number of bacteria soil increases since it mixing is not possible?

Is there a correct answer to exercise 1? I am continuously thinking about it and really need to know a correct answer.

#feedback #help

I am thinking about it myself. Since J > F or /F > /J. But since both A and C, COULD be true.

Since "to be a Jedi" is a sufficient condition, does that mean one could become a Jedi another way? Hence, the MUST BE TRUE answer would be A, "Tom is not a force user"?

To ensure I am thinking correctly.

For question 4, "The number of beneficial soil bacteria increases whenever plant material is mixed into garden soil. However, in order to mix plant material into garden soil, one must know how to cast the Herbivicus Charm"

Group 1: Mixed > Increases / Contrapositive: /Increases > /Mixed

Group 2: Mixed > Cast / Contrapositive: /Cast > /Mixed

However, there is no connection between "increases" and "cast".

But, if there was an additional sentence that contained a conclusion that said" Therefore, if you knows how to cast the charm, then the soil bacteria increases". Would that connection the two allowing a chaining of the conditionals to be formed?

Ultimately, a contrapositive of a conditional statement will bring about a negative comparative as well? I understand for the conditional of sufficient and necessary, A > B or /B > /A. However, if you break down the comparative within the necessary condition as A & B. If sufficient is true, A is the winner. But if you create the contrapositive, A is no longer the winner, and it is either equal or B wins.

Am I understanding this correctly?