- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I am so confused on why it is not E, or why E is not even possible. Is it because E refers to multiple instances rather than simply satisfying the condition. I am just not sure.
I got the same answer but my thought process is different. I read the stim and found what the phenomena meant to explain then just went through the answers from that. I don't know if that is a good habit or can that lead to development of a bad habit?
I have a question, how come there is no intersection with coffeehouses and well designed when the first claim is saying that all coffeehouses are public places and the second claim saying that most public places that are well designed feature artwork. I can see why its wrong because of the most claim, but it does intersect, does it not?
These questions confused me because I truly do not understand how the answer is not considered an assumption. We are assuming that there are more small studies, is this not the case? I picked C because the argument is taking to separate claims and from that draws its conclusion. I am not sure, these questions are annoying me.
happening to me too