A 165 is a very good score. Higher than some students will ever obtain truth be told. Please don't cancel that.

Went back and forth between C & D, but it got it right. The stimulus reminds me of the 1965 MGM studio fire when nitrate films caught on fire.

As another user explained, there has to be a reasonable limit to how difficult questions on the LSAT should be. This question goes beyond that limit. No question should be so difficult that a 167 scorer has only 50% chance of getting the question correct.

If this is 1/5 difficulty i'm in trouble.

No way this is 2/5 difficulty . (i got it correct but still)

I got it correct (at the last second) but 7sage needs to do an audit of the difficulty on questions. This is really more of a 4/5 difficulty IMO.

I would assume that the time targets guide you to have enough time to finish the whole section comfortably, as well as allow you time to possibly skip questions and return to them later without stress. I would't be concerned about the time targets unless you are consistently going over by say 30 or 40 seconds depending on the question difficulty.

The difficulty rating for this question really needs a bump up.

I received this accommodation as well as double time. Accommodated Testing appears to be the most stingy with requests regarding extra time. You have to argue for whatever accommodation you want/need. Even with supporting documentation they will be stingy to varying degrees!

if this was a section on the test i'd have that 180 in the bag.

I would send LSAC support an e-mail explaining your situation. I would assume they will work with you the best they can.