I personally feel like 7sage let me down. I studied as much as I could working full time. I took PTs, did drills, and still all for nothing. What do I do?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
if this was a section on the test i'd have that 180 in the bag.
The difficulty rating for this question really needs a bump up.
I received this accommodation as well as double time. Accommodated Testing appears to be the most stingy with requests regarding extra time. You have to argue for whatever accommodation you want/need. Even with supporting documentation they will be stingy to varying degrees!
As another user explained, there has to be a reasonable limit to how difficult questions on the LSAT should be. This question goes beyond that limit. No question should be so difficult that a 167 scorer has only 50% chance of getting the question correct.
With the removal of logic games, i'm anticipating LSAC to make up for the difference with a harder LR section. All LSATs are hard, but what level of hard might next month's test will be?
Hi,
One of my granted accommodations is to skip the ungraded, experimental section on the new LSAT. I've noticed there is no way to avoid taking the ungraded section when taking PTs, unlike the outgoing PTs. Why is this?
I would send LSAC support an e-mail explaining your situation. I would assume they will work with you the best they can.
If this is 1/5 difficulty i'm in trouble.
No way this is 2/5 difficulty . (i got it correct but still)
A 165 is a very good score. Higher than some students will ever obtain truth be told. Please don't cancel that.
I got it correct (at the last second) but 7sage needs to do an audit of the difficulty on questions. This is really more of a 4/5 difficulty IMO.
Went back and forth between C & D, but it got it right. The stimulus reminds me of the 1965 MGM studio fire when nitrate films caught on fire.