User Avatar
jjeong14
Joined
Jul 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 155
CAS GPA
3.71
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

American
In process
Baltimore
In process
Catholic University
In process
DePaul
In process
George Mason
In process
George Washington
In process
GSU
In process
Howard
In process
LSU
In process
Maryland
In process
Mercer
In process
Pennsylvania State - Penn State Law
In process
Regent
In process
Rutgers
In process
Washington & Lee
In process
William & Mary
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
jjeong14
Saturday, Jul 25

@KimberlyN Might do the same

1
User Avatar
jjeong14
Thursday, Jul 9

2/5 bad..

2
User Avatar
jjeong14
Thursday, Jul 9

First time 5/5

1
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jul 1

Takes too long to answer.

2
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jul 1

4/5 q 5 I was fixated on looking for P and C assuming this is an argument.

1
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jul 1

4/5 q5 got me

1
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

@DCrankshaw agreed this is a whole new vocab

4
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

Disney argument is the strongest because there are only two ways to obtain the pass and the passage confirms Walt did not prostrated. Thus, it leaves only one way to obtain the ticket.

Tiger argument presents stronger argument because the conclusion accepts wide range of premises to support them. The only premise to provide is one or more example of a mammal that is not suitable to keep due to various reasons, such as agressiveness, allergy concerns, etc to support the conclusion which the premise successfully did.

2
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

Mr. Fat Cat: Some one failed the quiz so bad including both the MC and SE section. Jim looks miserable and has been on a call with her mom the whole morning. His facial expression resembles the sad face we make after being scolded by parents for doing something wrong. I believe Jim is the one who failed the quiz.

1
User Avatar
jjeong14
Edited Wednesday, Jun 24

Premise : Tigers are very agressive...

Conclusion: Not every mammal is suitable...

P supports C, and it makes sense. P being true strengthens trust that C could be more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're confused about why "Not every mammal is suitable..." statement can't be the premise, the statement does not confirm that all mammals are not suitable to keep as a pet.

For example:

Premise : Not every mammal is suitable...

Conclusion: Tigers are very agressive...

We simply don't know if Tiger is one of the mammals P claims to be not suitable to keep as a pet. Therefore, it does not support the conclusion.

Please enlighten me with the wrath of your knowledge if I'm wrong.

11
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

I dread about RC

3
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

@ana2324 Here. Good luck!

2
User Avatar
jjeong14
Wednesday, Jun 24

Attitude and persevere everyone! So help me God

11
User Avatar
jjeong14
Edited Wednesday, Jun 24

Most of my friends play tennis.

Anyone who plays tennis are rich.

Most of my friends are rich.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?