- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
4/5 q 5 I was fixated on looking for P and C assuming this is an argument.
Disney argument is the strongest because there are only two ways to obtain the pass and the passage confirms Walt did not prostrated. Thus, it leaves only one way to obtain the ticket.
Tiger argument presents stronger argument because the conclusion accepts wide range of premises to support them. The only premise to provide is one or more example of a mammal that is not suitable to keep due to various reasons, such as agressiveness, allergy concerns, etc to support the conclusion which the premise successfully did.
Mr. Fat Cat: Some one failed the quiz so bad including both the MC and SE section. Jim looks miserable and has been on a call with her mom the whole morning. His facial expression resembles the sad face we make after being scolded by parents for doing something wrong. I believe Jim is the one who failed the quiz.
Premise : Tigers are very agressive...
Conclusion: Not every mammal is suitable...
P supports C, and it makes sense. P being true strengthens trust that C could be more.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're confused about why "Not every mammal is suitable..." statement can't be the premise, the statement does not confirm that all mammals are not suitable to keep as a pet.
For example:
Premise : Not every mammal is suitable...
Conclusion: Tigers are very agressive...
We simply don't know if Tiger is one of the mammals P claims to be not suitable to keep as a pet. Therefore, it does not support the conclusion.
Please enlighten me with the wrath of your knowledge if I'm wrong.
@KimberlyN Might do the same