- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Pls someone explain how you are supposed to do all of this in under two minutes...
I mean this question took me years to decipher through the word vomit
#help
Does a rule have to address all of the premises to "fully trigger" the sufficient condition and yield the conclusion or necessary condition? Like when JY talked about how answer choice C could have been right if it said "if an act is done with an intention to cause harm then it is wrong" it would have been right, even if it never addressed the premise knowing right from wrong... Im confused.
How is "only" translated into a most relationship... I thought "only" implied a necessary condition. Now I am confused
I was between E and C but felt like E actually went along with the stimulus and C was more outside of the stimulus scope. Anyone else think this way
love the try it first and then video explanation after format
So I got 12/14 right, but my timing is terrible. I was overall 10 minutes slower than target time... how do I go faster, because at this rate I won't finish the test on time.
If this confuses you, look up the some train from the logical reasoning bible and it explains this type of argument really well
So did I overthink this one... ? I saw how it said "our" national economists in the stimulus and then answer choice C just said "national economists" and thought it was too broad because there are so many nations and who is to say what national economists think in regards to the values/beliefs of the economists of one country.