i dont get why d is the answer. what if there are other forms of art not included? premodern only focuses on painting and sculpture. if we take music out of the equation, that is good, but what if premodern doesn't focus on drawings for example?

In RC, I'm having trouble with locating where I need to be per a question stem. Sometimes the same or a similar concept is throughout the passage, and the point we need is just hidden among words and words of text. How can I locate where I need to be faster?

how are we supposed to make our own notes on the actual test if we cant annotate? i know we get scratch paper but how are we supposed to match each paragraph break including the ones we make, etc

What are some important causal words we should recognize, like "produce?"

can you say that /active <-s-> participant -> certificate can be equal to /certificate -> /participant <-s-> active?

but how do you know that we only have two options?? (spacecraft or alien intelligence) what if there is another way??

I understand that we are trying to deny the "some" intersection, but why can't negating "some A are B" lead to "few A are B" if it is smaller on the hierarchy?

all->most->many->some->few

i got a 5/5 but my timing is not good. for two questions i was 4 minutes over. i am a beginner at lsat prep but i think even though timing shouldnt be a pressure rn that's kind of absurd?

I ATE THAT UPPPPPPPP

why are you assuming that you have to increase the habitat? what if experts put them in a controlled, enclosed space to help breed more panthers (250+), but it isn't their original habitat?

i got it right, but in my notes i wrote that it's ok to not be economically successful; as long as you protect liberties, you're successful. so i feel like the answer i chose (c) was the strongest but has nothing to do with guaranteeing overall success, as the present administration protected individual liberties anyways?

I don't get how you can just pick any idea and choose if it's going to be the sufficient or necessary condition. Shouldn't we understand what the sentence is trying to say too?

i dont get it, isnt "any" extreme? what if we could reduce the rate of traffic by some illogical way, like making the law that you cant have pets? should it still be implemented? e feels too broad