- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Bro same, I literally don't understand any of these NA questions and I absolutely HATE negating
Finally! After getting all the previous questions wrong in this section, I got this one right! I guess rule-app NA questions are not for me.
Thank you! This was extremely helpful for me:)
I literally had the same thought. Like it just seems like common sense, whereas on the LSAT it literally has nothing to do with laws and just logic, which I hate.
Yes... I think. I didn't choose B because the stimulus wasn't focused on flooding. Didn't choose C because the stimulus doesn't talk about materials of construction. Eliminated D because the stimulus didn't talk about misleading anyone, and E was eliminated because it didn't talk about environmental impacts in the stimulus. POE is very helpful for me.
I agree, the last one felt harder.
I watch some of the beginning and then watch the correct answer part and the answer choice I almost picked.
Which lessons in this section talks about sufficient and necessary conditions? I literally can't find them anywhere.
Why am I getting these right but not weakening ones correct?
I was between A and B and chose B. Only because I misunderstood "a certain type of occurrence" for eating dairy foods.
me too. I try not to beat myself up about it
I don't understand how to tell if it is a cost benefit analysis question?
These types of experimental questions are more rare on the LSAT correct? Or did I mishear him?
Something that helps me is that I kinda get rid of chooses that use the words "all", "only", and "always". Like in law everything depends on something. So using words like all, only, and always gives no room for other options.
Yes!! I had a harder time with main conclusion than I did with these.
I'm not 100% sure. I think the first time you attempt the question, you choose the option you think is best (because you're timed). Then you click blind review and analyze each option( because you're not timed anymore. You don't necessarily change your answer if you think it's right. It's just so you can further look at the options without being timed. At least that's what I think it's used for.
Guys, I looked up the definition of ontology. It's the "study of existence". Which is confusing in itself