Something that helps me is that I kinda get rid of chooses that use the words "all", "only", and "always". Like in law everything depends on something. So using words like all, only, and always gives no room for other options.

Which lessons in this section talks about sufficient and necessary conditions? I literally can't find them anywhere.

Why am I getting these right but not weakening ones correct?

I was between A and B and chose B. Only because I misunderstood "a certain type of occurrence" for eating dairy foods.

Guys, I looked up the definition of ontology. It's the "study of existence". Which is confusing in itself

I don't understand how to tell if it is a cost benefit analysis question?

These types of experimental questions are more rare on the LSAT correct? Or did I mishear him?

Finally! After getting all the previous questions wrong in this section, I got this one right! I guess rule-app NA questions are not for me.