I spoke way too soon (re: my comment on the previous lesson, lol). I rushed this one and choose E without even looking at the other answer choices. D was obviously the right answer.
I got it right but then messed up on BR by focusing too much on the word "significantly" and interpreting opposite of "more harm" as "equal or less harm" and not necessarily "less harm". But upon another review, the word "believe" made it so apparent. DO NOT overthink! :(
I didn't have time to look at the answers choices fully because I spent time reading the stimulus carefully. I had 14 seconds left to answer when I didn't finish reading the stimulus.
Are there any tips to get through the stimulus while understanding it more quickly? I feel like if I read quicker, I don't retain the information of the stimulus.
Just practice really. The more you do these questions, the quicker it will just become intuitive to look for certain things. I have already cut my time in half through doing drills and just breaking down the stimulus into predicate, conclusion etc. so I know in the back of my mind what I am looking for.
Can someone explain the difference between B and D a little more? I feel like medicine part of the stimulus, saying that medicine has both beneficial and harmful effects. It made me think the same for the government.
The medicine portion argues medicine should only be taken when the costs of taking the medication are less than the costs of not taking the medication.
This does not imply anything about the overall amount of harm arising from either condition. It can be true that a medicine creates significant harm, but not taking the medicine would be more harmful. JY's example of chemotherapy is helpful to see this concept, chemotherapy itself causes a lot of harm to the body but it saves lives so it is still justifiable.
Answer choice B eliminates this comparative element, stating any government action that creates significant harmful effects cannot be justified, regardless of the current costs of doing nothing. Therefore, answer choice B removes the element you identified as most important, the existence and comparison of these potential effects. This is the difference between absolute and relative language he explains in the answer choice B explanation above.
Answer choice D directly points to this comparison using the language "less damage" to compare the two choices.
I am now going through the course content for the second time. I wanted to share that when I first attempted this question three months ago, it took me 2 minutes and 16 seconds to get it right. Now, on my second pass, without remembering the answer, I got it right in just 43 seconds. It really does get easier! Stick with the course content and make sure to do a practice test once a week.
I am just solidifying my understanding of some of the terms. It can be hard to remember every single question type thoroughly the first time through. I am also able to see what my strengths and weaknesses are.
When I do these i just say "okay" with each point or reference. I.e "All scientist love to golf" Me: okay, okay.
At the end this nonchalant approach saves me fron getting over invested in the details that do not matter. Such as, scientists who live in (insert complicated name) golf more in the summer because the weather is nicer during that time of year. Me: okay.
I got this question right after one read with this method.
I'm not 100% sure. I think the first time you attempt the question, you choose the option you think is best (because you're timed). Then you click blind review and analyze each option( because you're not timed anymore. You don't necessarily change your answer if you think it's right. It's just so you can further look at the options without being timed. At least that's what I think it's used for.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
66 comments
I had to use caveman language, it helps.
Medicine bad, No medicine bad-er
=
Gov. int bad, No gov. int bad-er yayyy
19s over time, but I got both right! :)
got both of these you try q's right! this second one took longer for me to get tho lol
i got it right! :) but was still over the time limit:/ hopefully I improve on that soon :)
Only 9 Seconds over and got it on first try!!
E can be reasonably argued to mean the same thing as D.
I wish E had a better explanation as to why it's wrong.
I got it right but it took me a hot minute
Mapping out the premise and supporting conclusion makes this so much easier! However, it does take a bit of time. Any advice?
@MacyHolcomb practice a lot is the only way
I spoke way too soon (re: my comment on the previous lesson, lol). I rushed this one and choose E without even looking at the other answer choices. D was obviously the right answer.
@LawyeRell Gotta love Blind Review
BOOM LET'S GO!
I got it right but then messed up on BR by focusing too much on the word "significantly" and interpreting opposite of "more harm" as "equal or less harm" and not necessarily "less harm". But upon another review, the word "believe" made it so apparent. DO NOT overthink! :(
I went about it this way ...
medicine:
ethical -> when nonuse would be sig more harmful than its use
gov intervention
justified -> when non-gov intervention would be sig more harmful than intervening (AKA answer D)
hope this helps?
how is this a level 1 question. ive done level 4-5 questions much harder
@DillonDavidesfahani easier***
Completed this question in 36 seconds and got it right, but then I see the question difficulty being 1 :(
lol me too
@matthewr1126 I definitely feel like this should be at least a level 2.
I didn't have time to look at the answers choices fully because I spent time reading the stimulus carefully. I had 14 seconds left to answer when I didn't finish reading the stimulus.
Are there any tips to get through the stimulus while understanding it more quickly? I feel like if I read quicker, I don't retain the information of the stimulus.
Just practice really. The more you do these questions, the quicker it will just become intuitive to look for certain things. I have already cut my time in half through doing drills and just breaking down the stimulus into predicate, conclusion etc. so I know in the back of my mind what I am looking for.
i really dont understand this whole stimulus
@tariksoliman7 it's funky because it's structured strange but basically, if we break it down
context: Gov intervention can have negative effects.
This is just like medicine! (principle)
(what?) Yeah, most medicines have bad and good things, so the ONLY time it's okay to use medicine is if it would be worse to not.
SO, gov intervention is okay ONLY when....
Hope that helps!
These are all so easy and suddenly when you do a timed drill it's so difficult :///
sammeeee. I was getting all the MC right, but when it got to timed drills I legit had to do a double take.
Can someone explain the difference between B and D a little more? I feel like medicine part of the stimulus, saying that medicine has both beneficial and harmful effects. It made me think the same for the government.
The medicine portion argues medicine should only be taken when the costs of taking the medication are less than the costs of not taking the medication.
This does not imply anything about the overall amount of harm arising from either condition. It can be true that a medicine creates significant harm, but not taking the medicine would be more harmful. JY's example of chemotherapy is helpful to see this concept, chemotherapy itself causes a lot of harm to the body but it saves lives so it is still justifiable.
Answer choice B eliminates this comparative element, stating any government action that creates significant harmful effects cannot be justified, regardless of the current costs of doing nothing. Therefore, answer choice B removes the element you identified as most important, the existence and comparison of these potential effects. This is the difference between absolute and relative language he explains in the answer choice B explanation above.
Answer choice D directly points to this comparison using the language "less damage" to compare the two choices.
Hope that helps!
I am now going through the course content for the second time. I wanted to share that when I first attempted this question three months ago, it took me 2 minutes and 16 seconds to get it right. Now, on my second pass, without remembering the answer, I got it right in just 43 seconds. It really does get easier! Stick with the course content and make sure to do a practice test once a week.
Thanks for the tips!
Can I ask why you're going through the course content again? Something in me is telling me I will likely do the same...
I am just solidifying my understanding of some of the terms. It can be hard to remember every single question type thoroughly the first time through. I am also able to see what my strengths and weaknesses are.
If im getting the correct answers, is it harmful to watch the video? Im afraid over-explanation is going to further confuse my instinct. Any advice?
I don't watch the video when I got it right.
Brilliant!
GIR → /WV
WV→/GIR
Got it right on the first try, this supported method does work. I feel accomplished getting these 2 last questions right.
When I do these i just say "okay" with each point or reference. I.e "All scientist love to golf" Me: okay, okay.
At the end this nonchalant approach saves me fron getting over invested in the details that do not matter. Such as, scientists who live in (insert complicated name) golf more in the summer because the weather is nicer during that time of year. Me: okay.
I got this question right after one read with this method.
lol
Ooh, I am definitely going to try this. Thanks so much!
I wish I could write on these drill questions. Highlighting is just not enough!
Luckily they give you a sheet of paper to do rough work, as well as being able to write on the exam I believe!
Is there a way to write on the question modules like in the video? It would be very helpful when trying to solve! #help #feedback
How do we use the blind review??
If you change for the V1 syllabus, you'll find a lesson on the blind review.
I'm not 100% sure. I think the first time you attempt the question, you choose the option you think is best (because you're timed). Then you click blind review and analyze each option( because you're not timed anymore. You don't necessarily change your answer if you think it's right. It's just so you can further look at the options without being timed. At least that's what I think it's used for.
Thank you!
change to* sorry aaa